Chemotherapy plus Erlotinib versus Chemotherapy Alone for Treating Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Xu, J. L. [1 ]
Jin, B. [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Z. H.
Lou, Y. Q. [1 ]
Zhou, Z. R. [3 ]
Yang, Q. Z. [4 ]
Han, B. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Pulm, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ninth Peoples Hosp Shanghai, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Dept Oncol, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai Med Coll, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[4] Women & Child Care Heyuan, Dept Gynecol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; 2ND-LINE TREATMENT; OPEN-LABEL; COMBINATION; TRIAL; GEMCITABINE; MULTICENTER; CARBOPLATIN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0131278
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Whether a combination of chemotherapy and erlotinib is beneficial for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. This study aimed to summarize the currently available evidence and compare the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy plus erlotinib versus chemotherapy alone for treating advanced NSCLC. Methods EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies. Our protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42014015015). Results Nine randomized controlled trials with a total of 3599 patients were included. Compared to chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus erlotinib was superior in PFS (HR = 0.76 [95% CI 0.62, 0.92], P = 0.006), and no statistically significant difference was observed in OS (HR = 0.94 [95% CI 0.86, 1.03], P = 0.16). Intercalated erlotinib plus chemotherapy demonstrated improvements in PFS (HR = 0.67 [95% CI 0.50, 0.91], P = 0.009) and OS (HR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.69, 0.98], P = 0.03). Continuous erlotinib plus chemotherapy treatment failed to demonstrate improvements in PFS (HR = 0.91 [95% CI 0.80, 1.04], P = 0.16) and OS (HR = 0.98 [95% CI 0.89, 1.09], P = 0.75). The association of chemotherapy plus erlotinib with improvement in PFS was significant in never smoking patients (HR = 0.46 [95% CI 0.37, 0.56], P < 0.00001) but not in smoking patients (HR = 0.70 [95% CI 0.49, 1.00], P = 0.05). Among patients with EGFR mutant tumors, chemotherapy plus erlotinib demonstrated significant improvements in PFS (HR = 0.31 [95% CI 0.17, 0.58], P = 0.0002) and OS (HR = 0.52 [95% CI 0.30, 0.88], P = 0.01). Among patients with EGFR wild-type tumors, no statistically significant difference was observed with respect to PFS (HR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.70, 1.08], P = 0.21) and OS (HR = 0.78 [95% CI 0.59, 1.01], P = 0.06). Conclusion Combination of chemotherapy and erlotinib is a viable treatment option for patients with NSCLC, especially for patients who never smoked and patients with EGFR mutation-positive disease. In addition, intercalated administration is an effective combinatorial strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comparing erlotinib alone with erlotinib plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Chen, C.
    Hua, H.
    Gong, X.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [2] Chemotherapy plus Vandetanib or Chemotherapy Alone in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Four Randomised Controlled Trials
    Xiao, Yong-Ying
    Zhan, Ping
    Yuan, Dong-Mei
    Liu, Hong-Bing
    Lv, Tang-Feng
    Shi, Yi
    Song, Yong
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 25 (01) : E7 - E15
  • [3] Kanglaite Injection Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Xuemei
    Xu, Feng
    Wang, Gang
    Diao, Xiang
    Li, Youping
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2008, 69 (05): : 381 - 411
  • [4] A meta-analysis of the therapeutic effect of gefitinib combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in treating non-small cell lung cancer
    Zhao, Qingda
    Sun, Kai
    Lei, Xuemei
    Cai, Le
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (31) : E21490
  • [5] Systematic review and meta-analysis of Endostar (rh-endostatin) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Rong Biaoxue
    Yang Shuanying
    Li Wei
    Zhang Wei
    Ming Zongjuan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 10
  • [6] Systematic review and meta-analysis of Endostar (rh-endostatin) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Rong Biaoxue
    Yang Shuanying
    Li Wei
    Zhang Wei
    Ming Zongjuan
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 10
  • [7] Meta-analysis of the literature: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone in non-small cell lung cancer
    Dan, L.
    Zhu, B.
    Chen, Z.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China
    Zhang, Mengdie
    Xu, Kai
    Lin, Yingtao
    Zhou, Chongchong
    Bao, Yuwen
    Zhang, Lingli
    Li, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [9] Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody plus chemotherapy for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer A meta-analysis
    Luo, Wenqing
    Li, Yuanqi
    Ye, Fei
    Li, Qiangming
    Zhang, Guoqing
    Li, Jindong
    Li, Xiangnan
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (47)
  • [10] Chemotherapy with cetuximab versus chemotherapy alone for chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Yang, Zu-Yao
    Liu, Li
    Mao, Chen
    Wu, Xin-Yin
    Huang, Ya-Fang
    Hu, Xue-Feng
    Tang, Jin-Ling
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (11):