Drone culture: perspectives on autonomy and anonymity

被引:6
|
作者
Benjamin, Garfield [1 ]
机构
[1] Solent Univ, East Pk Terrace, Southampton SO14 0YN, Hants, England
关键词
Drone; UAV; Culture; Parallax; Simulation; Assemblage; Relational; Socio-technical; SIMULATION; WAR;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-020-01042-7
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article addresses the problematic perspectives of drone culture. In critiquing focus on the drone's apparent 'autonomy', it argues that such devices function as part of a socio-technical network. They are relational parts of human-machine interaction that, in our changing geopolitical realities, have a powerful influence on politics, reputation and warfare. Drawing on zizek's conception of parallax, the article stresses the importance of culture and perception in forming the role of the drone in widening power asymmetries. It examines how perceptions of autonomy are evoked by drones, to claim that this misperception is a smokescreen that obscures the relational socio-technical realities of the drone. The article therefore argues that a more critical culture of the drone emerges by shifting the focus and perception from autonomy to anonymity. This allows us to engage more fully with the distributed agency and decision-making that define how drones are developed and deployed. Rather than focusing on the drone as a singular, fetishised, technical object, a relational approach to the drone assemblage is proposed that highlights the competing human interests that define and resist drones in global politics and culture.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 645
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Drone culture: perspectives on autonomy and anonymity
    Garfield Benjamin
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2022, 37 : 635 - 645
  • [2] Perspectives on Autonomy
    Keys, Yolanda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 39 (09): : 357 - 359
  • [3] Reinforcement learning for shared autonomy drone landings
    Kal Backman
    Dana Kulić
    Hoam Chung
    [J]. Autonomous Robots, 2023, 47 : 1419 - 1438
  • [4] Reinforcement learning for shared autonomy drone landings
    Backman, Kal
    Kulic, Dana
    Chung, Hoam
    [J]. AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, 2023, 47 (08) : 1419 - 1438
  • [5] Democratizing Drone Autonomy via Edge Computing
    Bala, Mihir
    Eiszler, Thomas
    Chen, Xiangliang
    Harkes, Jan
    Blakley, James
    Pillai, Padmanabhan
    Satyanarayanan, Mahadev
    [J]. 2023 IEEE/ACM SYMPOSIUM ON EDGE COMPUTING, SEC 2023, 2023, : 40 - 52
  • [6] Perspectives on Autonomy and Control
    Gynnild, Astrid
    [J]. GROUNDED THEORY REVIEW, 2015, 14 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [7] Full autonomy: A novel individualized anonymity model for privacy preserving
    Le, Junqing
    Liao, Xiaofeng
    Yang, Bo
    [J]. COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2017, 66 : 204 - 217
  • [8] Sizing of the Drone Delivery Fleet Considering Energy Autonomy
    Troudi, Asma
    Addouche, Sid-Ali
    Dellagi, Sofiene
    El Mhamedi, Abderrahman
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [9] Drone Helps Privacy: Sky Caching Assisted $k$-Anonymity in Spatial Querying
    Jagarlapudi, Hema Naga Sai Sudha
    Lim, Sunho
    Chae, Jinseok
    Choi, Gyu Sang
    Pu, Cong
    [J]. IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (04): : 6360 - 6370
  • [10] Anti-Drone and Anti-Autonomy: Achieving Drone Control via System Logic Analysis
    Straub, Jeremy
    [J]. 2019 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2019,