Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity

被引:12
|
作者
Maloney, William F. [1 ]
Nayyar, Gaurav [2 ]
机构
[1] World Bank Grp, Equitable Growth Finance & Inst Practice Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[2] World Bank Grp, Finance Competitiveness & Innovat Global Practice, Washington, DC USA
来源
WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER | 2018年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; SOPHISTICATION; CLUSTERS; BUSINESS; ROADMAPS; QUALITY; TRADE;
D O I
10.1093/wbro/lkx006
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Governments are resource- and bandwidth-constrained, and hence need to prioritize productivity-enhancing policies. To do so requires information on the nature and magnitude of market failures on the one hand, and government's capacity to redress them successfully on the other. This article reviews perspectives on vertical (sectoral) and horizontal (factor markets, cluster) policies with a view to both criteria. We first argue that the case for either vertical or horizontal policies cannot be made on the basis of the likelihood of successful implementation: for instance, educational policies and "picking the winner" types of policies both run the risks of capture and incompetent execution. However, the economics profession has been able to establish more convincing market failures for horizontal policies than for vertical policies. Most of the recent approaches to identifying failures around particular goods are of limited help. Hence, for a given difficulty of execution, the former are generally preferred. A second critical message is that improving the quality of governance in terms of collecting information, coordination ability, and defending against capture is critical to the successful implementation of productivity policies and should be central on the policy agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 217
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条