Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in the context of high cervical cancer incidence and low screening coverage

被引:8
|
作者
Vorno, Triin [1 ]
Lutsar, Katrin [1 ]
Uuskula, Anneli [1 ]
Padrik, Lee [2 ]
Raud, Terje [2 ]
Reile, Rainer [1 ]
Nahkur, Oliver [3 ]
Kiivet, Raul-Allan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Inst Family Med & Publ Hlth, Tartu, Estonia
[2] Tartu Univ Hosp, Womens Clin, Tartu, Estonia
[3] Univ Tartu, Inst Social Studies, Tartu, Estonia
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; HPV; Vaccination; Cervical cancer; Genital warts; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS-VACCINATION; GENITAL WARTS; QUADRIVALENT; BURDEN; TRANSMISSION; INFECTION; COUNTRIES; VACCINES; WOMEN; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.083
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Estonia has high cervical cancer incidence and low screening coverage. We modelled the impact of population-based bivalent, quadrivalent or nonavalent HPV vaccination alongside cervical cancer screening. Methods: A Markov cohort model of the natural history of HPV infection was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating a cohort of 12-year-old girls with bivalent, quadrivalent or nonavalent vaccine in two doses in a national, school-based vaccination programme. The model followed the natural progression of HPV infection into subsequent genital warts (GW); premalignant lesions (CIN 1-3); cervical, oropharyngeal, vulvar, vaginal and anal cancer. Vaccine coverage was assumed to be 70%. A time horizon of 88 years (up to 100 years of age) was used to capture all lifetime vaccination costs and benefits. Costs and utilities were discounted using an annual discount rate of 5%. Results: Vaccination of 12-year-old girls alongside screening compared to screening alone had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of (sic)14,007 (bivalent), (sic)14,067 (quadrivalent) and (sic)11,633 (nonavalent) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in the base-case scenario and ranged between (sic)5367-21,711, (sic)5142-21,800 and (sic)4563-18,142, respectively, in sensitivity analysis. The results were most sensitive to changes in discount rate, vaccination regimen, vaccine prices and cervical cancer screening coverage. Conclusion: Vaccination of 12-year-old girls alongside current cervical cancer screening can be considered a cost-effective intervention in Estonia. Adding HPV vaccination to the national immunisation schedule is expected to prevent a considerable number of HPV infections, genital warts, premalignant lesions, HPV related cancers and deaths. Although in our model ICERs varied slightly depending on the vaccine used, they generally fell within the same range. Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination was found to be most dependent on vaccine cost and duration of vaccine immunity, but not on the type of vaccine used. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6329 / 6335
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ADDING HPV VACCINATION TO CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAM IN HUNGARY
    Voko, Z.
    Nagyjanosi, L.
    Kalo, Z.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A270 - A271
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness analysis of HPV vaccination alongside cervical cancer screening programme in Slovenia
    Obradovic, Marko
    Mrhar, Ales
    Kos, Mitja
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 20 (04): : 415 - 421
  • [3] BEYOND CERVICAL CANCER: THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF HPV VACCINATION IN THE NETHERLANDS
    Setiawan, D.
    Cao, Q.
    Westra, T. A.
    Postma, M. J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A416 - A417
  • [4] Cost-Effectiveness of HPV Vaccination in the Prevention of Cervical Cancer in Malaysia
    Ezat, Wan Puteh Sharifa
    Aljunid, Syed
    [J]. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2010, 11 (01) : 79 - 90
  • [5] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS TO INCREASE HPV VACCINATION COVERAGE
    Spencer, Jennifer
    Brewer, Noel T.
    Trogdon, Justin
    Coyne-Beasley, Tamera
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E30 - E31
  • [6] Increasing HPV vaccination coverage to prevent oropharyngeal cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Choi, Sung Eun
    Choudhary, Abhishek
    Huang, Jingyi
    Sonis, Stephen
    Giuliano, Anna R.
    Villa, Alessandro
    [J]. TUMOUR VIRUS RESEARCH, 2022, 13
  • [7] The impact of alternate HPV vaccination and cervical screening strategies in Japan: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Palmer, Matthew R.
    Saito, Eiko
    Katanoda, Kota
    Sakamoto, Haruka
    Hocking, Jane S.
    Brotherton, Julia M. L.
    Ong, Jason J.
    [J]. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2024, 44
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening in Thailand
    Sharma, M.
    Ortendahl, J.
    van der Ham, E.
    Sy, S.
    Kim, J. J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (02) : 166 - 176
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening
    Goldie, Sue J.
    Kim, Jane J.
    Myers, Evan
    [J]. VACCINE, 2006, 24 : 164 - 170
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus DNA testing and HPV-16,18 vaccination
    Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Salomon, Joshua A.
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    Goldie, Sue J.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (05) : 308 - 320