3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study

被引:4
|
作者
Chua, Karen Sui Geok [1 ]
Krishnan, Rathi Ratha [1 ]
Yen, Jia Min [1 ]
Plunkett, Tegan Kate [1 ]
Soh, Yan Ming [1 ]
Lim, Chien Joo [2 ]
Chia, Catherine M. [3 ]
Looi, Jun Cong [3 ]
Ng, Suan Gek [4 ]
Rao, Jai [4 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Tan Tock Seng Rehabil Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Clin Res & Innovat Off, Singapore, Singapore
[3] AuMed Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Neurosci Inst, Dept Neurosurg, TTSH Campus, Singapore, Singapore
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 10期
关键词
CRANIOPLASTY; DEFECT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0258296
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives 3D-printed (3DP) customized temporary cranial protection solutions following decompressive craniectomy (DC) are currently not widely practiced. A pilot trial of a 3DP customized head protection prototype device (HPPD) on 10 subjects was conducted during the subacute rehabilitation phase. Materials and methods Subjects > 30 days post-DC with stable cranial flaps and healed wounds were enrolled. HPPD were uniquely designed based on individuals' CT scan, where the base conformed to the surface of the individual's skin covering the cranial defect, and the lateral surface threedimensionally mirrored, the contralateral healthy head. Each HPPD was fabricated using the fused deposition modeling method. These HPPD were then fitted on subjects using a progressive wearing schedule and monitored over 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 follow-up (FU) weeks. Outcomes during FU included; reported wearing time/day (hours), subjective pain, discomfort, pruritus, dislodgment, cosmesis ratings; and observed wound changes. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability without pain or wound changes within 30 minutes of HPPD fitting. Results In all, 10 enrolled subjects received 12 HPPDs [5/10 male, mean (SD) age 46 (14) years, mean (SD) duration post-DC 110 days (76)] and all subjects tolerated 30 minutes of initial HPPD fitting without wound changes. The mean (SD) HPPD mass was 61.2 g (SD 19.88). During 8 weeks of FU, no HPPD-related skin dehiscence was observed, while 20% (2/10) had transient skin imprints, and 80% (8/10) reported self-limiting pressure and pruritis. Discussion Findings from this exploratory study demonstrated preliminary feasibility and safety for a customized 3DP HPPD for temporary post-DC head protection over 8 weeks of follow-up. Monitoring and regular rest breaks during HPPD wear were important to prevent skin complications. Conclusion This study suggests the potential for wider 3DP technology applications to provide cranial protection for this vulnerable population.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D-Printed External Cranial Protection Following Decompressive Craniectomy After Brain Injury: An Exploratory Clinical Trial
    Chua, Karen
    Krishnan, Rathi Ratha
    Yen, Jia Min
    Plunkett, Tegan Kate
    Soh, Yan Ming
    Lim, Chien Joo
    Chia, Catherine
    Looi, Jun Cong
    Ng, Suan Gek
    Rao, Jai
    BRAIN INJURY, 2022, 36 : 14 - 15
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of a 3D-printed external cranial protection device in preventing complications after unilateral supratentorial decompressive craniectomy: A retrospective cohort study
    Guo, Peng
    Li, Jinping
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (49)
  • [3] Application of a 3D printed wig protection device after decompressive craniectomy
    Ma, Shasha
    Li, Chenglong
    Gu, Yue
    Chen, Yang
    Li, Xuexin
    Wang, Qingbo
    Xu, Hongmei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [4] Decompressive Craniectomy in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Yew, Wan Xin
    Lee, Jan Hau
    Dang, Hongxing
    Low, Sharon Yin Yee
    Sri Dewi, Dianna
    Chong, Shu-Ling
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE, 2023,
  • [5] Therapeutic Efficacy of Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Study
    Sharma, Rohit
    Janjani, Lalit
    Kulkarni, Vishal
    Patrikar, Seema
    Singh, Shailey
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (11) : 2423.e1 - 2423.e7
  • [6] Determinants of reoperation after decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury: A comparative study
    Khalili, Hosseinali
    Ghaffarpasand, Fariborz
    Niakan, Amin
    Golestani, Nasim
    Ahrari, Iman
    Abbasi, Hamid Reza
    Rasti, Ali
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 181 : 1 - 6
  • [7] Decompressive craniectomy for patients with severe non-traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study
    Hitchings, Louise
    Delaney, Anthony
    CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2010, 12 (01) : 16 - 23
  • [8] Detection of metabolic pattern following decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury: A microdialysis study
    Gupta, Deepak
    Singla, Raghav
    Mazzeo, Anna T.
    Schnieder, Eric B.
    Tandon, Vivek
    Kale, S. S.
    Mahapatra, A. K.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (12) : 1660 - 1666
  • [9] Intracranial pressure monitoring after primary decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: a clinical study
    Picetti, Edoardo
    Caspani, Maria Luisa
    Iaccarino, Corrado
    Pastorello, Giulia
    Salsi, Pierpaolo
    Viaroli, Edoardo
    Servadei, Franco
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2017, 159 (04) : 615 - 622
  • [10] Custom 3D-Printed External Cranial Orthotic for Prevention and Treatment of Syndrome of the Trephined
    Leach, Garrison A.
    Dean, Riley A.
    Cleary, Daniel R.
    Steinberg, Jeffrey A.
    Gosman, Amanda A.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (07) : E682 - E684