Baseline estrogen levels in postmenopausal women participating in the MAP.3 breast cancer chemoprevention trial

被引:22
|
作者
Richardson, Harriet [1 ,2 ]
Ho, Vikki [3 ]
Pasquet, Romain [3 ]
Singh, Ravinder J. [4 ]
Goetz, Matthew P. [5 ]
Tu, Dongsheng [1 ,2 ]
Goss, Paul E. [6 ]
Ingle, James N. [5 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Canadian Canc Trials Grp, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Ctr Rech CHUM CRCHUM, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Med Oncol, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, MGH Canc Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Estradiol; Estrone; Postmenopausal women; SEX-HORMONES; RISK-FACTORS; ESTRADIOL; MENOPAUSAL; GENE; POLYMORPHISMS; METABOLISM; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/GME.0000000000001568
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study was to quantify baseline estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) concentrations according to selected patient characteristics in a substudy nested within the MAP.3 chemoprevention trial. Methods: E2 and E1 levels were measured in 4,068 postmenopausal women using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Distributions were described by age, years since menopause, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and use and duration of hormone therapy using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable linear regression was also used to identify characteristics associated with estrogen levels. Results: After truncation at the 97.5th percentile, the mean (SD)/median (IQR) values for E2 and E1 were 5.41 (4.67)/4.0 (2.4-6.7) pg/mL and 24.7 (14.1)/21 (15-31) pg/mL, respectively. E2 and E1 were strongly correlated (Pearson correlation [r] = 0.8,P < 0.01). The largest variation in E2 and E1 levels was by BMI; mean E2 and E1 levels were 3.5 and 19.1 pg/mL, respectively for women with BMI less than 25 and 7.5 and 30.6 pg/mL, respectively, for women with BMI greater than 30. E2 and E1 varied by age, BMI, smoking status, and prior hormone therapy in multivariable models (P < 0.01). Conclusions: There was large interindividual variability observed for E2 and E1 that varied significantly by participant characteristics, but with small absolute differences except in the case of BMI. Although the majority of participant characteristics were independently associated with E1 and E2, together, these factors only explained about 20% of the variation in E1 and E2 levels.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 700
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] National cancer institute of Canada clinical trials group MAP.3 trial:: Evaluation of exemestane to prevent breast cancer in postmenopausal women
    Goss, Paul E.
    Richardson, Harriet
    Chlebowski, Rowan
    Johnston, Dianne
    Sarto, Gloria E.
    Maunsell, Elizabeth
    Ingle, James N.
    Ales-Martinez, Jose E.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2007, 7 (11) : 895 - 900
  • [2] Bone density and structure in healthy postmenopausal women treated with exemestane for the primary prevention of breast cancer: a nested substudy of the MAP.3 randomised controlled trial
    Cheung, Angela M.
    Tile, Lianne
    Cardew, Savannah
    Pruthi, Sandhya
    Robbins, John
    Tomlinson, George
    Kapral, Moira K.
    Khosla, Sundeep
    Majumdar, Sharmila
    Erlandson, Marta
    Scher, Judy
    Hu, Hanxian
    Demaras, Alice
    Lickley, Lavina
    Bordeleau, Louise
    Elser, Christine
    Ingle, James
    Richardson, Harriet
    Goss, Paul E.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (03): : 275 - 284
  • [3] Chemoprevention of breast cancer - Implications for postmenopausal women
    Fabian, CJ
    Kimler, BF
    DRUGS & AGING, 2002, 19 (01) : 43 - 78
  • [4] NCICCTG MAP.3: enrollment and study drug adherence of ethnic minority women in a breast cancer prevention trial
    Moy, B.
    Richardson, H.
    Johnston, D.
    Paler, J. L.
    Chlebowski, R.
    Ales-Martinez, J. E.
    Ingle, J.
    Goss, P. E.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 106 : S141 - S142
  • [5] Clinical development of estrogen modulators for breast cancer chemoprevention in premenopausal vs. postmenopausal women
    Lawrence, JA
    Malpas, PB
    Sigman, CC
    Kelloff, GJ
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, : 103 - 114
  • [6] Influence of Two Years of Exemestane on Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk of Developing Breast Cancer; a Companion Study to the NCIC CTG MAP.3 Trial.
    Goss, P. E.
    Richardson, H.
    Ingle, J. N.
    Chlebowski, R. T.
    Fabian, C. J.
    Garber, J. E.
    Sarto, G. E.
    Hiltz, A.
    Tu, D.
    Cheung, A. M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [7] The ATAC adjuvant breast cancer trial in postmenopausal women: baseline endometrial subprotocol data
    Duffy, S
    Jackson, TL
    Lansdown, M
    Philips, K
    Wells, M
    Pollard, S
    Clack, G
    Cuzick, J
    Coibion, M
    Bianco, AR
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2003, 110 (12) : 1099 - 1106
  • [8] Baseline Mammographic Breast Density and the Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women Participating in the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR)
    Cecchini, Reena S.
    Costantino, Joseph P.
    Cauley, Jane A.
    Cronin, Walter M.
    Wickerham, D. Lawrence
    Bandos, Hanna
    Weissfeld, Joel L.
    Wolmark, Norman
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (11) : 1321 - 1329
  • [9] Estrogen Metabolism and Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
    Fuhrman, Barbara J.
    Schairer, Catherine
    Gail, Mitchell H.
    Boyd-Morin, Jennifer
    Xu, Xia
    Sue, Laura Y.
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Keefer, Larry K.
    Veenstra, Timothy D.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Hoover, Robert N.
    Ziegler, Regina G.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2012, 104 (04) : 326 - 339
  • [10] Baseline hysteroscopic assessment of endometrium in asymptomatic postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Lubian Lopez, Daniel Maria
    Gonzalez Fernandez, Yurena
    Vilar Sanchez, Angel
    Iglesias Alvarez, Maria
    Lopez Reynaldo, Maria Isabel
    Comino Delgado, Rafael
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2013, 20 (01): : 64 - 71