Multi-objective optimization and prediction of surface roughness and printing time in FFF printed ABS polymer

被引:14
|
作者
Selvam, Arivazhagan [1 ]
Mayilswamy, Suresh [2 ]
Whenish, Ruban [3 ]
Naresh, K. [4 ]
Shanmugam, Vigneshwaran [5 ,6 ]
Das, Oisik [5 ]
机构
[1] KPR Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] PSG Coll Technol, Dept Robot & Automat Engn, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Vellore Inst Technol, Ctr Bio Mat Cellular & Mol Theranost, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Chem Engn & Mat Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[5] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[6] Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PARAMETERS; STRENGTH; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-20782-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this study, fused filament fabrication (FFF) printing parameters were optimized to improve the surface quality and reduce the printing time of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) polymer using the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), it is a statistical analysis tool. A multi-objective optimization technique was employed to predict the optimum process parameter values using particle swarm optimization (PSO) and response surface methodology (RSM) techniques. Printing time and surface roughness were analyzed as a function of layer thickness, printing speed and nozzle temperature. A central composite design was preferred by employing the RSM method, and experiments were carried out as per the design of experiments (DoE). To understand the relationship between the identified input parameters and the output responses, several mathematical models were developed. After validating the accuracy of the developed regression model, these models were then coupled with PSO and RSM to predict the optimum parameter values. Moreover, the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) ranking method was employed to compare the RSM and PSO to identify the best optimization technique. WASPAS ranking method shows PSO has finer optimal values [printing speed of 125.6 mm/sec, nozzle temperature of 221 degrees C and layer thickness of 0.29 mm] than the RSM method. The optimum values were compared with the experimental results. Predicted parameter values through the PSO method showed high surface quality for the type of the surfaces, i.e., the surface roughness value of flat upper and down surfaces is approximately 3.92 mu m, and this value for the other surfaces is lower, which is approximately 1.78 mu m, at a minimum printing time of 24 min.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-objective optimization and prediction of surface roughness and printing time in FFF printed ABS polymer
    Arivazhagan Selvam
    Suresh Mayilswamy
    Ruban Whenish
    K. Naresh
    Vigneshwaran Shanmugam
    Oisik Das
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [2] Surface Roughness Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Honing Cylinder Liner
    Lü, Yanjun
    Li, Jie
    Jiang, Cheng
    Li, Pengzhou
    Zhang, Yongfang
    Chang, Huan
    [J]. Mocaxue Xuebao/Tribology, 2022, 42 (04): : 728 - 741
  • [3] Optimization of time, cost and surface roughness in grinding process using a robust multi-objective dragonfly algorithm
    Khalilpourazari, Soheyl
    Khalilpourazary, Saman
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2020, 32 (08): : 3987 - 3998
  • [4] Optimization of time, cost and surface roughness in grinding process using a robust multi-objective dragonfly algorithm
    Soheyl Khalilpourazari
    Saman Khalilpourazary
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32 : 3987 - 3998
  • [5] Early Time Series Anomaly Prediction With Multi-Objective Optimization
    Chao, Ting-En
    Huang, Yu
    Dai, Hao
    Yen, Gary G.
    Tseng, Vincent S.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TOPICS IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024,
  • [6] Multi-objective optimization of surface parameters such as concavity, straightness and roughness in milling process
    Gupta, Ashutosh
    Shah, Ratnam
    Dave, Harsh
    Khanna, Navneet
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 5 (02) : 5296 - 5302
  • [7] PORTFOLIO DECISION USING TIME SERIES PREDICTION AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION
    Lu, Jia
    Shazemeen, Noor Muhammad
    Martinkute-Kauliene, Raimonda
    [J]. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING, 2020, 23 (04): : 118 - 130
  • [8] Prediction of Surface Roughness of 304 Stainless Steel and Multi-Objective Optimization of Cutting Parameters Based on GA-GBRT
    Zhou, Tao
    He, Lin
    Wu, Jinxing
    Du, Feilong
    Zou, Zhongfei
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (18):
  • [9] Modeling and Optimization of Surface Roughness in Incremental Sheet Forming using a Multi-objective Function
    Liu, Zhaobing
    Liu, Sheng
    Li, Yanle
    Meehan, Paul Anthony
    [J]. MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2014, 29 (07) : 808 - 818
  • [10] Effect of Printing Parameters on Dimensional Error, Surface Roughness and Porosity of FFF Printed Parts with Grid Structure
    Buj-Corral, Irene
    Bagheri, Ali
    Sivatte-Adroer, Maurici
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (08)