Quality of Recovery and Innate Immune Homeostasis in Patients Undergoing Low-pressure Versus Standard-pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (RECOVER) A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:21
|
作者
Albers, Kim, I [1 ,2 ]
Polat, Fatih [3 ]
Helder, Leonie [1 ]
Panhuizen, Ivo F. [4 ]
Snoeck, Marc M. J. [4 ]
Polle, S. W. [3 ]
de Vries, Hilbert [3 ]
Dias, Esther M. [5 ]
Slooter, Gerrit D. [6 ]
de Boer, Hans D. [7 ]
Diaz-Cambronero, Oscar [8 ]
Mazzinari, Guido [8 ]
Scheffer, Gert-Jan [1 ]
Keijzer, Christiaan [1 ]
Warle, Michiel C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboudumc, Dept Anesthesiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboudumc, Dept Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[6] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[7] Martini Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Pain Med & Procedural Sedat & An, Groningen, Netherlands
[8] La Fe Univ & Polytech Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Valencia, Spain
关键词
laparoscopy; laparoscopic surgery; low pressure pneumoperitoneum; intra-abdominal pressure; deep neuromuscular blockade; QoR-40; DAMPs; innate immunity; postoperative infections; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; ENHANCED RECOVERY; DEFINITIONS; RELIABILITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000005491
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:To study the effects of intra-abdominal pressure on the quality of recovery and innate cytokine production capacity after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within the enhanced recovery after surgery program. Background:There is increasing evidence for the safety and advantages of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum facilitated by deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Nonetheless, there is a weak understanding of the relationship between clinical outcomes, surgical injury, postoperative immune dysfunction, and infectious complications. Methods:Randomized controlled trial of 178 patients treated at standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (12 mm Hg) with moderate NMB (train-of-four 1-2) or low pressure (8 mm Hg) facilitated by deep NMB (posttetanic count 1-2). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery (Quality of Recovery 40 questionnaire) on a postoperative day 1 (POD1). The primary outcome of the immune substudy (n=100) was ex vivo tumor necrosis factor alpha production capacity upon endotoxin stimulation on POD1. Results:Quality of Recovery 40 score on POD1 was significantly higher at 167 versus 159 [mean difference (MD): 8.3 points; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5, 14.1; P=0.005] and the decline in cytokine production capacity was significantly less for tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 (MD: -172 pg/mL; 95% CI: -316, -27; P=0.021 and MD: -1282 pg/mL; 95% CI: -2505, -59; P=0.040, respectively) for patients operated at low pressure. Low pressure was associated with reduced surgical site hypoxia and inflammation markers and circulating damage-associated molecular patterns, with a less impaired early postoperative ex vivo cytokine production capacity. At low pressure, patients reported lower acute pain scores and developed significantly less 30-day infectious complications. Conclusions:Low intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe, improves the postoperative quality of recovery and preserves innate immune homeostasis, and forms a valuable addition to future enhanced recovery after surgery programs.
引用
收藏
页码:E664 / E673
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial
    S. Celarier
    S. Monziols
    M. O. Francois
    V. Assenat
    P. Carles
    M. Capdepont
    C. Fleming
    E. Rullier
    G. Napolitano
    Q. Denost
    [J]. Trials, 21
  • [2] Prospective randomized trial on low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Chok, Kenneth S.
    Yuen, Wai Key
    Lau, Hung
    Fan, Sheung Tat
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2006, 16 (06): : 383 - 386
  • [3] Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial
    Celarier, S.
    Monziols, S.
    Francois, M. O.
    Assenat, V.
    Carles, P.
    Capdepont, M.
    Fleming, C.
    Rullier, E.
    Napolitano, G.
    Denost, Q.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [4] Comparison of Standard-pressure and Low-pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
    Vijayaraghavan, Nandhagopal
    Sistla, Sarath Chandra
    Kundra, Pankaj
    Ananthanarayan, Palghat Hariharan
    Karthikeyan, Vilvapathy Senguttuvan
    Ali, Sheik Manwar
    Sasi, Sajith P.
    Vikram, Krishnamurthy
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (02): : 127 - 133
  • [5] A prospective randomized trial on comparison of low-pressure (LP) and standard-pressure (SP) pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    M. Barczyński
    R.M. Herman
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 : 533 - 538
  • [6] A prospective randomized trial on comparison of low-pressure (LP) and standard-pressure (SP) pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Barczynski, M
    Herman, RM
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (04): : 533 - 538
  • [7] Low-pressure versus standard pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery (PAROS trial): a phase III randomized controlled trial
    Celarier, S.
    Monziols, S.
    Celerier, B.
    Assenat, V
    Carles, P.
    Napolitano, G.
    Laclau-Lacrouts, M.
    Rullier, E.
    Ouattara, A.
    Denost, Q.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (08) : 998 - 1005
  • [8] Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Monica Ortenzi
    Giulia Montori
    Alberto Sartori
    Andrea Balla
    Emanuele Botteri
    Giacomo Piatto
    Gaetano Gallo
    Silvia Vigna
    Mario Guerrieri
    Sophie Williams
    Mauro Podda
    Ferdinando Agresta
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 7092 - 7113
  • [9] Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ortenzi, Monica
    Montori, Giulia
    Sartori, Alberto
    Balla, Andrea
    Botteri, Emanuele
    Piatto, Giacomo
    Gallo, Gaetano
    Vigna, Silvia
    Guerrieri, Mario
    Williams, Sophie
    Podda, Mauro
    Agresta, Ferdinando
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (10): : 7092 - 7113
  • [10] Impact of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial
    Hemanga K. Bhattacharjee
    Azarudeen Jalaludeen
    Virinder Bansal
    Asuri Krishna
    Subodh Kumar
    Rajeshwari Subramanium
    Rashmi Ramachandran
    Mahesh Misra
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 1287 - 1295