Costs and benefits of straight versus tortuous migration paths for Prairie Rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis viridis) in seminatural and human-dominated landscapes

An individual's migration path shape should affect its fitness, because patchily distributed features (e.g., prey) are encountered more often on straight than tortuous paths. We hypothesized that Prairie Rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis viridis (Rafinesque, 1818)) with straighter migration paths should have better body condition, because they encounter prey patches more frequently, and higher migration mortality, because they also encounter predators and hazardous human land uses more frequently, than individuals with tortuous paths. If true, then a straighter path should be favoured when the benefit (resource acquisition) outweighs the cost (mortality risk). Humans pose a significant mortality risk for migrants; thus, the cost of straight-line movement should increase relative to the benefit in more human-dominated landscapes, favouring more tortuous movements. We tested these hypotheses using data on the body condition, mortality, and migration movements of 25 female Prairie Rattlesnakes in one human-dominated and one seminatural landscape. As hypothesized, we found better body condition and higher migration mortality for snakes with straighter migration paths, and that snakes followed more tortuous paths in the human-dominated landscape. Although selection for tortuous movements may reduce rates of migration mortality in human-dominated landscapes, this may ultimately contribute to population declines if poorer body condition reduces overwinter survival or reproductive success.