Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups

被引:18
|
作者
Tian, Lili [1 ]
Xiong, Chengjie [2 ]
Lai, Chin-Ying [1 ]
Vexler, Albert [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Biostat, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Div Biostat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Diagnostic accuracy; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC); curve; Generalized pivot; Generalized test variable; ROC CURVES; PAIRED AREAS; TESTS; EQUIVALENCE; INFERENCES; ABILITY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspi.2010.07.004
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
In the cases with three ordinal diagnostic groups, the important measures of diagnostic accuracy are the volume under surface (VUS) and the partial volume under surface (PVUS) which are the extended forms of the area under curve (AUC) and the partial area under curve (PAUC). This article addresses confidence interval estimation of the difference in paired VUS s and the difference in paired PVUS s. To focus especially on studies with small to moderate sample sizes, we propose an approach based on the concepts of generalized inference. A Monte Carlo study demonstrates that the proposed approach generally can provide confidence intervals with reasonable coverage probabilities even at small sample sizes. The proposed approach is compared to a parametric bootstrap approach and a large sample approach through simulation. Finally, the proposed approach is illustrated via an application to a data set of blood test results of anemia patients. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 558
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard
    Kang, Le
    Xiong, Chengjie
    Tian, Lili
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2013, 68 : 326 - 338
  • [2] A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups
    Xiong, Chengjie
    van Belle, Gerald
    Miller, J. Philip
    Yan, Yan
    Gao, Feng
    Yu, Kai
    Morris, John C.
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 49 (05) : 682 - 693
  • [3] Diagnostic Thresholds with Three Ordinal Groups
    Attwood, Kristopher
    Tian, Lili
    Xiong, Chengjie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 24 (03) : 608 - 633
  • [4] Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories
    Kang, Le
    Xiong, Chengjie
    Crane, Paul
    Tian, Lili
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (04) : 631 - 643
  • [5] Estimating diagnostic accuracy for clustered ordinal diagnostic groups in the three-class caseApplication to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease
    Xiong, Chengjie
    Luo, Jingqin
    Chen, Ling
    Gao, Feng
    Liu, Jingxia
    Wang, Guoqiao
    Bateman, Randall
    Morris, John C.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (03) : 701 - 714
  • [6] Alternative Confidence Interval Methods Used in the Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
    Erdogan, Semra
    Gulhan, Orekici Temel
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 2016
  • [7] Estimating Accuracy and Confidence Interval of an Intelligent Diagnostic Reasoner System
    Das, Sreerupa
    Harris, Michelle
    [J]. 2009 IEEE AUTOTESTCON, 2009, : 284 - 287
  • [8] Analysis of diagnostic confidence and diagnostic accuracy: a unified framework
    Ng, C. S.
    Palmer, C. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 80 (951): : 152 - 160
  • [9] Estimation of the volume under the ROC surface with three ordinal diagnostic categories
    Kang, Le
    Tian, Lili
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2013, 62 : 39 - 51
  • [10] CONFIDENCE INTERVAL OF RESIDUAL DIAGNOSTIC PARAMETER
    MEZAKI, R
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 1972, 18 (04) : 852 - &