Predictors of vaginal delivery in medically indicated early preterm induction of labor

被引:18
|
作者
Sievert, Rachel A. [1 ]
Kuper, Spencer G. [1 ]
Jauk, Victoria C. [1 ]
Parrish, Melissa [1 ]
Biggio, Joseph R. [1 ]
Harper, Lorie M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Womens Reprod Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
elective cesarean delivery; induction of labor; medically indicated preterm delivery; predictors of vaginal delivery; preterm delivery; SEVERE PREECLAMPSIA; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.025
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: When delivery is indicated prior to 34 weeks, many providers perform a cesarean delivery rather than induce labor based on perceptions of a high failure rate. Given the morbidity of cesarean delivery, an accurate estimate of the success rate and factors associated with success in preterm induction of labor is important in management decisions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a prediction model for successful induction of labor in preterm patients using factors known at the time the decision is made to deliver. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of all live singletons undergoing an indicated induction of labor between 23 and 34 0/7 weeks from 2011 through 2015. Pregnancies with major fetal anomalies or no intrapartum fetal monitoring were excluded. Successful induction of labor was defined as vaginal delivery. The cohort was randomly split into a training cohort to develop a prediction model for vaginal delivery and a validation cohort to test the model. Factors significantly associated with vaginal delivery were identified using univariate analyses, and candidate factors were used in the multivariate logistic regression model. Only factors known at the start of the induction of labor were used in the model. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were created to estimate the predictive value of the model. Sensitivity and specificity of the model were assessed. RESULTS: Of 331 patients who underwent induction of labor, 208 (62.8%) delivered vaginally and 123 (37.1%) by cesarean delivery. Of the factors significantly associated with cesarean delivery, the final model included gestational age, simplified Bishop score, suspected intrauterine growth retardation, chronic hypertension, and body mass index. In the training cohort, the model correctly classified 72.3% of subjects with a sensitivity (cesarean delivery predicted/cesarean delivery performed) of 56.7% and a specificity (vaginal delivery predicted/vaginal delivery performed) of 84.1%. When applied to the validation cohort, 73.9% of subjects were correctly classified, with a sensitivity of 44.6% and specificity of 89.0%. Receiver-operating characteristic curves had an area under the curve of 0.75 for the training cohort and 0.77 for the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: More than 60% of women undergoing induction of labor at < 34 0/7 weeks deliver vaginally. For women undergoing induction of labor at < 34 0/7 weeks, this prediction model rarely classifies individuals who can have a vaginal delivery as needing a cesarean delivery. This model may provide an accurate assessment tool to evaluate which patients will likely deliver vaginally to avoid the morbidity of cesarean delivery while conversely identifying subjects at high risk of cesarean delivery < 34 0/7 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:375.e1 / 375.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of vaginal delivery in medically indicated preterm induction of labor
    Sievert, Rachel A.
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Jauk, Victoria
    Parrish, Melissa
    Biggio, Joseph R.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S248 - S249
  • [2] Labor Curve Analysis of Medically Indicated Early Preterm Induction of Labor
    Becker, David A.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Wang, Michelle J.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 134 (04): : 759 - 764
  • [3] Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves
    Feghali, Maisa
    Timofeev, Julia
    Huang, Chun-Chih
    Driggers, Rita
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    Landy, Helain J.
    Umans, Jason G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : 91.e1 - 91.e7
  • [4] Induction of labor versus scheduled cesarean for medically indicated early preterm birth
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Sievert, Rachel A.
    Steele, Robin
    Biggio, Joseph R.
    Tita, Alan T.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S114 - S114
  • [5] Interdelivery Interval and Medically Indicated Preterm Delivery
    Dude, Annie M.
    Grobman, William A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2019, 36 (01) : 86 - 89
  • [6] A Glimmer of Hope for Medically Indicated Preterm Delivery
    Forman, Michele R.
    Chehab, Rana F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 30 (09) : 1216 - 1216
  • [7] Early amniotomy for indicated induction of labor in late preterm gestations
    Brock, Clifton
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S239 - S239
  • [8] Predicting vaginal delivery in women undergoing induction of labor at preterm
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Huang, Chun-Chih
    Auguste, Tamika C.
    Bauer, David
    Overcash, Rachael T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S13 - S14
  • [9] Non-Medically Indicated Induction and Augmentation of Labor
    不详
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2014, 43 (05): : 678 - 681
  • [10] Risk of preterm delivery after medically indicated termination of pregnancy with induced vaginal delivery: a case-control study
    Hini, Jean-Daniel
    Kayem, Gilles
    Quibel, Thibaud
    Berveiller, Paul
    De Carne Carnavale, Celine
    Delorme, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (06) : 1693 - 1702