A critical review of published research literature reviews on nursing and healthcare ageism

被引:22
|
作者
Wilson, Donna M. [1 ]
Nam, Mavis A. [2 ]
Murphy, Jill [3 ]
Victorino, Joao P. [4 ]
Gondim, Ellen C. [4 ]
Low, Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Ghana, Sch Nursing, Legon, Ghana
[3] Univ Limerick, Dept Nursing & Midwifery, Limerick, Ireland
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Coll Nursing, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
关键词
ageism; age discrimination; nursing; healthcare; review of literature reviews; meta-synthesis; evidence; OLDER-PEOPLE; NURSES ATTITUDES; ADULTS; DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.13803
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectivesTo establish how common and impactful nursing and healthcare ageism is and whether proven interventions or prevention methods exist. BackgroundAgeism has been a concern since 1969 when it was first introduced as a concept for social reform. As ageism has been linked to lower quality health services and reduced health care access, it is imperative that healthcare and nursing ageism is prevented or identified and reduced or eliminated. DesignA qualitative narrative review of published research literature reviews using a scoping design to map all published reviews was undertaken. The EBSCO Discovery Service (providing access to articles in 271 databases, including MEDLINE and CINAHL) and Directory of Open Access Journals (providing access to over 9,000 open access journals) were used to find review articles. Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and limited by English language and peer-review publications, 12 eligible reviews were identified and information from them was systematically identified, assessed and synthesised. ResultsThe 12 reviews did not provide clear and convincing information to determine how common and impactful nursing or healthcare ageism is, nor what can best be done to prevent or address it. Although each review had value since research literature was collected and discussed on nursing or healthcare ageism, the array of literature search and analysis methods, and diversity in conclusions reached about the evidence is highly problematic. ConclusionResearch literature reviews offering a more balanced perspective and demonstrating greater care in finding and using quality evidence are needed. Relevance to clinical practiceAt this point in time, there is no clear understanding of how widespread and impactful nursing or healthcare ageism is, and what can best be done to prevent or address it. Nurses need to be aware that ageism may be common and impactful, and guard against it.
引用
收藏
页码:3881 / 3892
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characteristics of Reviews Published in Nursing Literature: A Methodological Review
    Toronto, Coleen E.
    Quinn, Brenna L.
    Remington, Ruth
    ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 2018, 41 (01) : 30 - 40
  • [2] Ageism in Nursing Education: A Review of the Literature
    Gallo, Veronica
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN NURSING, 2019, 14 (03) : 208 - 215
  • [3] CORRESPONDENCE TO "CHARACTERISTICS OF REVIEWS PUBLISHED IN NURSING LITERATURE: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW" BY TORONTO AND COLLEAGUES
    Tam, Wilson
    Goh, Shawn Y. S.
    ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 2018, 41 (02) : 100 - 100
  • [4] The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high-impact nursing journals: a review of the literature
    Polkki, Tarja
    Kanste, Outi
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Elo, Satu
    Kyngas, Helvi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2014, 23 (3-4) : 315 - 332
  • [5] CRITICAL REVIEWS AND EVALUATIONS OF PUBLISHED LITERATURE ON SUBSTITUTE CHILD CARE
    PRINGLE, MLK
    DINNAGE, R
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1970, 23 (79): : 134 - 134
  • [6] Systematic reviews of machine learning in healthcare: a literature review
    Kolasa, Katarzyna
    Admassu, Bisrat
    Holownia-Voloskova, Malwina
    Kedzior, Katarzyna J.
    Poirrier, Jean-Etienne
    Perni, Stefano
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01) : 63 - 115
  • [7] A Systematic Integrated Literature Review of Systematic Integrated Literature Reviews in Nursing
    Im, Eun-Ok
    Chang, Sun Ju
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2012, 51 (11) : 632 - U110
  • [8] Evaluation and critical review of clinical and fundamental research studies on osteopathy published in the European literature
    Schwerla, F
    Hass-Degg, K
    Schwerla, B
    FORSCHENDE KOMPLEMENTARMEDIZIN, 1999, 6 (06): : 302 - 310
  • [9] Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews
    O'Donohoe, Tom J.
    Bridson, Tahnee L.
    Shafik, Christopher G.
    Wynne, David
    Dhillon, Rana S.
    Tee, Jin W.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 88 (05) : 891 - 899
  • [10] Reviews of Literature in Nursing Research Methodological Considerations and Defining Characteristics
    Silva, Amina Regina
    Padilha, Maria Itayra
    Petry, Stefany
    Silva, Vanessa Silva E.
    Woo, Kevin
    Galica, Jacqueline
    Wilson, Rosemary
    Luctkar-Flude, Marian
    ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 2022, 45 (03) : 197 - 208