共 50 条
Due diligence in the open-access explosion era: choosing a reputable journal for publication
被引:10
|作者:
Masten, Yondell
[1
]
Ashcraft, Alyce
[1
]
机构:
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Nursing, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
关键词:
open access;
predatory journals;
predatory publishers;
characteristics of ethical and unethical publishing practices;
due diligence activities for selecting reputable journals;
PREDATORY OPEN ACCESS;
D O I:
10.1093/femsle/fnx206
中图分类号:
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号:
071005 ;
100705 ;
摘要:
Faculty are required to publish. Naive and "in-a-hurry-to-publish" authors seek to publish in journals where manuscripts are rapidly accepted. Others may innocently submit to one of an increasing number of questionable/predatory journals, where predatory is defined as practices of publishing journals for exploitation of author-pays, open-access publication model by charging authors publication fees for publisher profit without provision of expected services (expert peer review, editing, archiving, and indexing published manuscripts) and promising almost instant publication. Authors may intentionally submit manuscripts to predatory journals for rapid publication without concern for journal quality. A brief summary of the open access "movement," suggestions for selecting reputable open access journals, and suggestion for avoiding predatory publishers/journals are described. The purpose is to alert junior and seasoned faculty about predatory publishers included among available open access journal listings. Brief review of open access publication, predatory/questionable journal characteristics, suggestions for selecting reputable open access journals and avoiding predatory publishers/journals are described. Time is required for intentionally performing due diligence in open access journal selection, based on publisher/journal quality, prior to manuscript submission or authors must be able to successfully withdraw manuscripts when submission to a questionable or predatory journal is discovered.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文