Efficacy and Time Sensitivity of Amniotic Membrane treatment in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Laurent, Irakoze [1 ]
Astere, Manirakiza [2 ]
Wang, Kan Ran [1 ]
Cheng, Qing-feng [1 ]
Li, Qi Fu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Endocrinol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Amniotic membrane; Diabetic foot ulcers; Meta-analysis; Standard therapy; Systematic review; ALLOGRAFT; MULTICENTER; MANAGEMENT; AMPUTATION; PROLIFERATION; ASSOCIATION; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; GRAFT;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-017-0298-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are complex chronic wounds which have a major long-term impact on the morbidity, mortality and quality of patients. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and time sensitivity of human amnion/chorion membrane treatment in patients with chronic DFUs. Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles up to 10 April 2017. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing human amnion/chorion membrane ? standard therapy and standard therapy alone in patients with DFUs were included in the analysis. Eligible studies were reviewed and data extracted into standard form. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias was used. Review manager version 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using a random effect model. Results: Overall, the initial search of the four databases identified 352 published studies; of these, seven RCTS were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The overall test effect in the group assessed at 4 weeks was Z = 4.14 [P < 0.0001; odds ratio (OR) 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.21]. The overall test effect in the group assessed at 6 weeks was Z = 4.28 (P < 0.0001; OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02-0.23). The overall effect in the group assessed at 12 weeks was Z = 4.96 (P < 0.00001; OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.04-0.24. The results showed that patients receiving amniotic membrane + standard therapy had far fewer incomplete healing wounds than those receiving standard of care alone. Assessment of the wound healing state at 4 and 6 weeks revealed that the wound healing state was almost the same, but there was a net difference of wound healing state at 12 weeks. Conclusion: Human amnion/chorion membrane ? standard of care treatment heals DFUs significantly faster than standard of care alone. When using the amnion in patients with DFUs, the optimal times to assess progress in wound healing should be 4 and 12 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 979
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Time Sensitivity of Amniotic Membrane treatment in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Irakoze Laurent
    Manirakiza Astère
    Kan Ran Wang
    Qing-feng Cheng
    Qi Fu Li
    [J]. Diabetes Therapy, 2017, 8 : 967 - 979
  • [2] Human amniotic membrane products for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. do they help? a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yasmine Adel Mohammed
    Hossam Khaled Farouk
    Mohamed Ibrahim Gbreel
    Abdelrahman Mahmoud Ali
    Ali Ashraf Salah
    Anas Zakarya Nourelden
    Mohamed Mahmoud Abd-El Gawad
    [J]. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 15
  • [3] Human amniotic membrane products for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. do they help? a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohammed, Yasmine Adel
    Farouk, Hossam Khaled
    Gbreel, Mohamed Ibrahim
    Ali, Abdelrahman Mahmoud
    Salah, Ali Ashraf
    Nourelden, Anas Zakarya
    Abd-El Gawad, Mohamed Mahmoud
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [4] Human amniotic membrane allograft, a novel treatment for chronic diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Su, Ya-Na
    Zhao, Ding-Yun
    Li, Yong-Hong
    Yu, Tian-Qi
    Sun, Huan
    Wu, Xin-Yu
    Zhou, Xiao-Qin
    Li, Jing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (03) : 753 - 764
  • [5] Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Peng, Yundong
    Wang, JiePing
    Liu, Xinyao
    Zhou, Yanqing
    Jia, Shaohui
    Xu, Jinrong
    Zheng, Cheng
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 98 : 365 - 373
  • [6] Electromechanical therapy in diabetic foot ulcers patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rathnayake, Ayeshmanthe
    Saboo, Apoorva
    Vangaveti, Venkat
    Malabu, Usman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2023, 22 (02) : 967 - 984
  • [7] The Incidence of Depression in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Fu-Hui
    Liu, Xiao-Man
    Yu, Hai-Rong
    Qian, Yan
    Chen, Hong-Lin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOWER EXTREMITY WOUNDS, 2022, 21 (02): : 161 - 173
  • [8] Electromechanical therapy in diabetic foot ulcers patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ayeshmanthe Rathnayake
    Apoorva Saboo
    Venkat Vangaveti
    Usman Malabu
    [J]. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 2023, 22 : 967 - 984
  • [9] The prevalence of foot ulcers in diabetic patients in Pakistan: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akhtar, Sohail
    Ali, Aqsa
    Ahmad, Sadique
    Khan, Muhammad Imran
    Shah, Sajid
    Hassan, Fazal
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [10] The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sharma, Harman
    Sharma, Sandhli
    Krishnan, Anirudh
    Yuan, Daniel
    Vangaveti, Venkat N.
    Malabu, Usman H.
    Haleagrahara, Nagaraja
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):