Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct

被引:12
|
作者
Satalkar, Priya [1 ]
Shaw, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Inst Biomed Eth, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Barriers to reporting misconduct; obligation to report misconduct; qualitative research; Raising concerns about misconduct; RCR education and instruction; research integrity; research misconduct; responsible conduct of research; whistleblowing; SCIENTISTS; FRAUD;
D O I
10.1080/08989621.2018.1493577
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This article describes and discusses the views of researchers on the significance of raising concerns about scientific misconduct in their work environment and the reasons or circumstances that might deter them from doing so. In this exploratory qualitative research study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 33 researchers working in life sciences and medicine. They represent three seniority levels and five universities across Switzerland. A large majority of respondents in this research study argued that failure to raise concerns about scientific misconduct compromises research integrity. This is an encouraging result demonstrating that researchers try to adhere to high ethical standards. However, further interaction with respondents highlighted that this correct ethical assessment does not lead researchers to take the consequent action of raising concerns. The factors that discourage researchers from raising concerns need to be addressed at the level of research groups, institutions, and by setting a positive precedent which helps them to believe in the system's ability to investigate concerns raised in a timely and professional manner. Training of researchers in research integrity related issues will have limited utility unless it is coupled with the creation of research culture where raising concerns is a standard practice of scientific and research activities.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 339
页数:29
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] MISCONDUCT IN SCIENCE - CONCERNS DEMANDING THE ATTENTION OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCHERS
    不详
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (02): : 177 - 177
  • [2] Errors and Integrity in Seeking and Reporting Apparent Research Misconduct
    Kharasch, Evan D.
    Houle, Timothy T.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 127 (05) : 733 - 737
  • [3] Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: errors and integrity
    Kharasch, E. D.
    Houle, T. T.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 (01) : 125 - 126
  • [4] Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy
    Alex Mabou Tagne
    Niccolò Cassina
    Alessia Furgiuele
    Elisa Storelli
    Marco Cosentino
    Franca Marino
    [J]. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2020, 18 : 193 - 205
  • [5] Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy
    Mabou Tagne, Alex
    Cassina, Niccolo
    Furgiuele, Alessia
    Storelli, Elisa
    Cosentino, Marco
    Marino, Franca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2020, 18 (02) : 193 - 205
  • [6] Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: errors and integrity - a reply
    Carlisle, J. B.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 (01) : 126 - 128
  • [7] Research integrity: UK guidelines are updated to ensure misconduct reporting
    Mahase, Elisabeth
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 367 : l6320
  • [8] Research integrity - it's about more than misconduct
    Downey, Frances
    Veitch, Rebecca
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2021, 6 (04) : 283 - 284
  • [9] The Specter of Fraud Stimulus funds for science raise concern about misconduct
    Reich, Eugenie Samuel
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2009, 301 (01) : 24 - 25
  • [10] A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences
    Mousavi, Taraneh
    Abdollahi, Mohammad
    [J]. DARU-JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 28 (01) : 359 - 369