Risk analysis for water resources management under dual uncertainties through factorial analysis and fuzzy random value-at-risk

被引:18
|
作者
Kong, X. M. [1 ]
Huang, G. H. [2 ]
Fan, Y. R. [3 ]
Li, Y. P. [2 ]
Zeng, X. T. [4 ]
Zhu, Y. [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Polytech, Fundamental Coll, Beijing 100176, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Ctr Energy Environm & Ecol Res, UR BNU, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Regina, Inst Energy Environm & Sustainable Communities, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[4] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Labor Econ, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[5] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Environm & Municipal Engn, Xian 710055, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Fuzzy random value-at-risk; Decision analysis; Uncertainty modelling; Water resources; Multi-level factorial design; CONDITIONAL VALUE; OPTIMIZATION MODEL; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; SIMULATION; RIVER; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-017-1382-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water resources systems are associated with a variety of complexities and uncertainties due to socio-economic and hydro-environmental impacts. Such complexities and uncertainties lead to challenges in evaluating the water resources management alternatives and the associated risks. In this study, the factorial analysis and fuzzy random value-at-risk are incorporated into a two-stage stochastic programming framework, leading to a factorial-based two-stage programming with fuzzy random value-at-risk (FTSPF). The proposed FTSPF approach aims to reveal the impacts of uncertainty parameters on water resources management strategies and the corresponding risks. In detail, fuzzy random value-at-risk is to reflect the potential risk about financial cost under dual uncertainties, while a multi-level factorial design approach is used to reveal the interaction between feasibility degrees and risk levels, as well as the relationships (including curvilinear relationship) between these factors and the responses. The application of water resources system planning makes it possible to balance the satisfaction of system benefit, the risk levels of penalty and the feasibility degrees of constraints. The results indicate that decision makers would pay more attention to the tradeoffs between the system benefit and feasibility degree, and the water allocation for agricultural section contributes most to control the financial loss of water. Moreover, FTSPF can generate a higher system benefit and more alternatives under various risk levels. Therefore, FTSPF could provide more useful information for enabling water managers to identify desired policies with maximized system benefit under different system-feasibility degrees and risk levels.
引用
收藏
页码:2265 / 2280
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk analysis for water resources management under dual uncertainties through factorial analysis and fuzzy random value-at-risk
    X. M. Kong
    G. H. Huang
    Y. R. Fan
    Y. P. Li
    X. T. Zeng
    Y. Zhu
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2017, 31 : 2265 - 2280
  • [2] Value-at-risk in uncertain random risk analysis
    Liu, Yuhan
    Ralescu, Dan A.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 391 : 1 - 8
  • [3] Conditional Value-at-Risk under ellipsoidal uncertainties
    Wong, M. H.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL FINANCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS III, 2008, : 217 - 226
  • [4] Water resources management under dual uncertainties: a factorial fuzzy two-stage stochastic programming approach
    Zhou, Yang
    Huang, Gordon
    Wang, Shuo
    Zhai, Yuanyuan
    Xin, Xiaying
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 30 (03) : 795 - 811
  • [5] Water resources management under dual uncertainties: a factorial fuzzy two-stage stochastic programming approach
    Yang Zhou
    Gordon Huang
    Shuo Wang
    Yuanyuan Zhai
    Xiaying Xin
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2016, 30 : 795 - 811
  • [6] A random-fuzzy portfolio selection DEA model using value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk
    Shiraz, Rashed Khanjani
    Tavana, Madjid
    Fukuyama, Hirofumi
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (22) : 17167 - 17186
  • [7] A random-fuzzy portfolio selection DEA model using value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk
    Rashed Khanjani Shiraz
    Madjid Tavana
    Hirofumi Fukuyama
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2020, 24 : 17167 - 17186
  • [8] On the Cognitive Surprise in Risk Management: An Analysis of the Value-at-Risk (VaR) Historical
    Baccan, Davi
    Sbruzzi, Elton
    Macedo, Luis
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BK, 2015, 9273 : 402 - 413
  • [9] Stability analysis of portfolio management with conditional value-at-risk
    Kaut, Michal
    Vladimirou, Hercules
    Wallace, Stein W.
    Zenios, Stavros A.
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2007, 7 (04) : 397 - 409
  • [10] A Value-at-Risk Analysis of Credit Risk in Romania
    Herghiligiu, Roxana
    [J]. INNOVATION VISION 2020: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, VOL I-VI, 2015, : 3070 - 3073