Fluvial stability of a transverse vs. a longitudinal riprap protection

被引:0
|
作者
de Almeida, Gustavo [1 ]
Pedro Martin-Vide, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Ingn Hidraul Maritima & Ambiental, ES-08034 Barcelona, Spain
来源
TECNOLOGIA Y CIENCIAS DEL AGUA | 2011年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
riverbed erosion; riprap; bed sill; scouring; incipient motion; BED; STREAMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
An experimental study was conducted in a laboratory to determine the influence of length, width, and protrusion of non-continuous riprap protections on shear failure conditions. The incipient motion of particles as a failure criterion and the reference transport method as the threshold of motion were used. In each test, riprap transport rates were measured at different time intervals using a sediment trap. Results reveal that incipient motion conditions of transverse (cross-sectional) protections are strongly influenced by both the protrusion and length of bed protection, which indicates that stability significantly increases as protection length increases and decreases as protrusion increases. In the case of longitudinal protections, almost the same failure conditions were found as in the case of continuous protection. Furthermore, these conditions are unrelated to the width of the protection. A coefficient to correct design formulas obtained by other authors is proposed to take into account the effect of the geometry of transverse protections on their stability.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 98
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Riprap Stability: Transverse and Longitudinal versus Continuous Protections
    de Almeida, Gustavo Adolfo M.
    Martin-Vide, Juan P.
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (06) : 447 - 456
  • [2] Weibull vs. Lognormal distributions for fluvial gravels
    Kondolf, G.M.
    Adhikari, A.
    Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2000, 70 (03) : 456 - 460
  • [3] Weibull vs. lognormal distributions for fluvial gravels
    Kondolf, GM
    Adhikari, A
    JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH, 2000, 70 (03): : 456 - 460
  • [4] Fire protection vs. environmental protection
    Wolinski, M
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2003, 82 (8-9): : 1060 - 1062
  • [5] Geosynthetically reinforced vegetation vs. riprap: A collection of case studies and cost analysis
    Lancaster, T
    INTERNATIONAL EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION - PROCEEDINGS OF CONFERENCE 28: EROSION CONTROL AND THE ENVIRONMENT ... WORKING IN HARMONY, 1997, 28 : 45 - 54
  • [6] Free trade vs. protection
    Mussey, H. R.
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1914, 4 (01): : 179 - 179
  • [7] Geosynthetically rein forced vegetation vs. riprap: A collection of case studies and cost analysis
    Lancaster, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF CONFERENCE 28 - INTERNATIONAL EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 28 : 45 - 54
  • [8] Redundancy vs. Protection vs. False Targets for Systems Under Attack
    Levitin, Gregory
    Hausken, Kjell
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2009, 58 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [9] Thermochemical vs. kinetic stability
    Shanley, ES
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2001, 79 (35) : 8 - 9
  • [10] Stability vs. no justified envy
    Romm, Assaf
    Roth, Alvin E.
    Shorrer, Ran I.
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2024, 148 : 357 - 366