Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review

被引:51
|
作者
Dieperink, C. [1 ]
Hegger, D. L. T. [1 ]
Bakker, M. H. N. [1 ]
Kundzewicz, Z. W. [2 ,3 ]
Green, C. [4 ]
Driessen, P. P. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, POB 80115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Agr & Forest Environm, Ul Bukowska 19, PL-60809 Poznan, Poland
[3] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Telegrafenberg 31, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[4] Middlesex Univ, Flood Hazard Res Ctr, London NW4 4BT, England
关键词
Flood risk governance; Flood risk management; Coordination mechanisms; Participation; Collaboration; Europe; Literature review; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; RIVER-BASINS; POLICY; NETHERLANDS; INSURANCE; GERMANY; AVAILABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In Europe increasing flood risks challenge societies to diversify their Flood Risk Management Strategies (FRMSs). Such a diversification implies that actors not only focus on flood defence, but also and simultaneously on flood risk prevention, mitigation, preparation and recovery. There is much literature on the implementation of specific strategies and measures as well as on flood risk governance more generally. What is lacking, though, is a clear overview of the complex set of governance challenges which may result from a diversification and alignment of FRM strategies. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap. It elaborates on potential processes and mechanisms for coordinating the activities and capacities of actors that are involved on different levels and in different sectors of flood risk governance, both concerning the implementation of individual strategies and the coordination of the overall set of strategies. It identifies eight overall coordination mechanisms that have proven to be useful in this respect.
引用
收藏
页码:4467 / 4481
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review
    C. Dieperink
    D. L. T Hegger
    M. H. N. Bakker
    Z. W. Kundzewicz
    C. Green
    P. P. J. Driessen
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2016, 30 : 4467 - 4481
  • [2] A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature
    Morrison, A.
    Westbrook, C. J.
    Noble, B. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 11 (03): : 291 - 304
  • [3] Flood risk management and governance: A bibliometric review of the literature
    Dordi, Truzaar
    Henstra, Daniel
    Thistlethwaite, Jason
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (02):
  • [4] Flood risk management - Challenges to the effective implementation of a paradigm shift
    Cooper, Jonathan
    Adamson, Mark
    Russell, Elizabeth
    [J]. PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2013, 14 (01) : 135 - 140
  • [6] Coastal urban flood risk management: Challenges and opportunities − A systematic review
    Aziz, Farhan
    Wang, Xiuquan
    Mahmood, Muhammad Qasim
    Awais, Muhammad
    Trenouth, Bill
    [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 645
  • [7] Resilient flood risk management strategies
    De Bruijn, KM
    Klijn, F
    [J]. FORECASTING AND MITIGATION OF WATER-RELATED DISASTERS, THEME C, PROCEEDINGS: 21ST CENTURY: THE NEW ERA FOR HYDRAULIC RESEARCH AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2001, : 450 - 457
  • [8] Governance challenges of flood-prone delta cities: Integrating flood risk management and climate change in spatial planning
    Francesch-Huidobro, Maria
    Dabrowski, Marcin
    Tai, Yuting
    Chan, Faith
    Stead, Dominic
    [J]. PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 2017, 114 : 1 - 27
  • [9] Issues and Challenges in Flood Risk Management-Editorial for the Special Issue on Flood Risk Management
    Jonkman, Sebastiaan N.
    Dawson, Richard J.
    [J]. WATER, 2012, 4 (04): : 785 - 792
  • [10] Resilient flood risk strategies: institutional preconditions for implementation
    Gersonius, Berry
    van Buuren, Arwin
    Zethof, Marit
    Kelder, Ellen
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (04):