Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of anal intraepithelial neoplasia

被引:92
|
作者
Lytwyn, A
Salit, IE
Raboud, J
Chapman, W
Darragh, T
Winkler, B
Tinmouth, J
Mahony, JB
Sano, M
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Hlth Network, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Hlth Network, Dept Pathol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pathol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
关键词
anal intraepithelial neoplasia; reliability; kappa statistic; human immunodeficiency virus; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS DNA; CERVICAL-CANCER; BETHESDA SYSTEM; CYTOLOGY; LESIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY; DIAGNOSIS; VARIABILITY; CARCINOMAS; PRECURSORS;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.20927
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Anal carcinoma incidence is increasing, and is highest among men with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who have sex with men. Anal carcinoma and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) are ascertained on tissue histology, but requires invasive procedures. Screening for AIN usinganal cytologywas suggested. The authors evaluated agreement on cytologic and biopsy specimens from HIV-positive men undergoing anal carcinoma screening. METHODS. One hundred twenty-nine HIV-positive men with a history of anal-receptive intercourse underwent anal cytology, anoscopy, and biopsy. Four pathologists independently assessed cytology and biopsy specimens and reached consensus for discordant cases. RESULTS. Each pathologist evaluated 120 cytology and 155 biopsy specimens. The weighted kappa value for overall agreement was 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.59) for cytology specimens and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.55-0.63) for biopsy specimens. The median kappa values for pairwise agreement among pathologists and for agreement with consensus were, respectively, 0.69 and 0.77 for cytology and 0.66 and 0.75 for biopsy. At least 3 pathologists were in agreement for 92 (76.7%) cytology and 134 (86.5%) biopsy specimens. Reliability for the Bethesda classification system was at least moderate, except for the cytologic category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (kappa = 0.12). Fourteen of 29 (48.3%) cytology specimens and 36 of 47 (76.6%) biopsy specimens with consensus interpretation of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) were interpreted originally as HSIL by >= 3 pathologists. The kappa value for agreement with consensus distinguishing HSIL from non-HSIL ranged from 0.55 to 0.88 for cytology specimens and from 0.76 to 0.94 for biopsy specimens. CONCLUSIONS. Agreement for cytologic and biopsy interpretations was generally at least moderate. Nevertheless, these results supported the need for disease indicators with greater reliabililty. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1447 / 1456
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] p16 Improves Interobserver Agreement in Diagnosis of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Bean, Sarah M.
    Meara, Regina S.
    Vollmer, Robin T.
    Conner, Michael G.
    Crowe, D. Ralph
    Novak, Lea
    Eltoum, Isam A.
    Robboy, Stanley J.
    Chhieng, David C.
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2009, 13 (03) : 145 - 153
  • [2] p16 staining improves interobserver agreement in diagnosing anal intraepithelial neoplasia
    Meara, R. S.
    Chhieng, D. C.
    Conner, M. G.
    Crowe, D. R.
    Novak, L.
    Ehoun, I. A.
    Bean, S. M.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 20 : 122A - 123A
  • [3] p16 staining improves interobserver agreement in diagnosing anal intraepithelial neoplasia
    Meara, R. S.
    Chhieng, D. C.
    Conner, M. G.
    Crowe, D. R.
    Novak, L.
    Eltoun, I. A.
    Bean, S. M.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 122A - 123A
  • [4] Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of anal cytology
    Benevolo, Maria
    Rollo, Francesca
    Latini, Alessandra
    Giuliani, Massimo
    Giglio, Amalia
    Giuliani, Eugenia
    Dona, Maria Gabriella
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2024, 132 (07) : 419 - 424
  • [5] Classifying Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 Based on LAST Recommendations Interobserver Agreement Among Experienced Pathologists
    Liu, Yuxin
    McCluggage, W. Glenn
    Darragh, Teresa M.
    Zheng, Wenxin
    Roberts, Jennifer M.
    Park, Kay J.
    Hui, Pei
    Blakely, Morgan
    Sigel, Keith
    Gaisa, Michael M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 155 (06) : 845 - 852
  • [6] INTEROBSERVER VARIATION IN THE REPORTING OF THE HISTOPATHOLOGICAL GRADING OF ANAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    CARTER, PS
    SHEFFIELD, JP
    SHEPHERD, N
    MELCHER, DH
    JENKINS, D
    EWINGS, P
    TALBOT, I
    NORTHOVER, JMA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1994, 47 (11) : 1032 - 1034
  • [7] Anal intraepithelial neoplasia
    de Parades, Vincent
    Fathallah, Nadia
    Barret, Maximilien
    Zeitoun, Jean-David
    Lemarchand, Nicolas
    Molinie, Vincent
    Weiss, Laurence
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2013, 42 (7-8): : 1091 - 1099
  • [8] Anal intraepithelial neoplasia
    Scholefield, JH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (11) : 1363 - 1364
  • [9] Anal intraepithelial neoplasia
    Pares, David
    Mullerat, Jose
    Pera, Miguel
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2006, 127 (19): : 749 - 755
  • [10] Anal intraepithelial neoplasia
    Abbasakoor, F
    Boulos, PB
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (03) : 277 - 290