Assessment and optimisation of life cycle environment, economy and energy for building retrofitting

被引:37
|
作者
Luo, X. J. [1 ]
Oyedele, Lukumon O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West England, Big Data Enterprise & Artificial Intelligence Lab, Frenchay Campus, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
Life cycle optimisation; Retrofitting; Renewable energy; Net-zero building; Embodied carbon; Life cycle assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.esd.2021.10.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Building retrofitting plays a vital role in realising net-zero carbon ambition. Conventional retrofitting solutions are generally based upon decreasing operating energy usage or corresponding costs. However, many of these would increase the embodied carbon and energy. The innovation of this paper is to develop a building retrofitting assessment and optimisation approach to select the optimal combination of retrofitting options to minimise its carbon emissions, economic costs and energy usage over its life cycle. A real-life three-floor real-world office building is implemented to exhibit the behaviour of the newly developed retrofitting assessment and optimisation approach. This paper mainly focuses on passive options, including improving envelope thermal properties (e.g. wall insulations, roof insulations and triple-glazed windows) and installing renewable energy devices (e.g. photovoltaic panel, solar heater and wind turbine). The effects of varying embodied carbon, investment cost, embodied energy, annual salvage ratio, and material recycle ratio on the life cycle behaviour of the retrofitted building is investigated. For cost optimisation, the selection priority is sheep wool for roof insulation, insulation board for wall insulation, solar heater and wind turbine. The selection priority for energy or carbon optimisation would be insulation board for wall insulation, sheep wool for roof insulation, solar heater, triple-glazed window, and wind turbine. The largest achievable reduction in life cycle carbon, cost and energy are 3.9 x 10(6) kg, 3.6 pound x 10(5) and 7.8 x 10(7) MJ, respectively. The research outcome will benefit the government for policymaking on approach-based net-zero retrofitting guidance and building engineers for designing sustainable retrofitting measures. (C) 2021 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 100
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A data-driven life-cycle optimisation approach for building retrofitting: A comprehensive assessment on economy, energy and environment
    Luo, X. J.
    Oyedele, Lukumon O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 43
  • [2] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment in Building Energy Retrofitting; A Review
    Toosi, Hashem Amini
    Lavagna, Monica
    Leonforte, Fabrizio
    Del Pero, Claudio
    Aste, Niccolo
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 60
  • [3] Life cycle optimisation of building retrofitting considering climate change effects
    Luo, X. J.
    Oyedele, Lukumon O.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 258
  • [4] Integrated life-cycle optimisation and supply-side management for building retrofitting
    Luo, Xiaojun
    Oyedele, Lukumon O.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 154
  • [5] Adopting an integrated building energy simulation and life cycle assessment framework for the optimisation of facades and fenestration in building envelopes
    Feehan, A.
    Nagpal, H.
    Marvuglia, A.
    Gallagher, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 43
  • [6] On the boundary between economy and environment in life cycle assessment
    Bo Pedersen Weidema
    Jannick Schmidt
    Peter Fantke
    Stefan Pauliuk
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1839 - 1846
  • [7] On the boundary between economy and environment in life cycle assessment
    Weidema, Bo Pedersen
    Schmidt, Jannick
    Fantke, Peter
    Pauliuk, Stefan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (09): : 1839 - 1846
  • [8] Retrofitting with different building materials: Life-cycle primary energy implications
    Piccardo, C.
    Dodoo, A.
    Gustavsson, L.
    Tettey, U. Y. A.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 192
  • [9] LIFE CYCLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT, AND ECONOMY ASSESSMENT OF GASOLINE AND ITS ALTERNATIVE ALCOHOL FUELS
    Hu, Zhi-Yuan
    Ding, Yu-Shan
    Song, Hao
    [J]. ENERGY AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, : 131 - 140
  • [10] Evaluation of hazelnut production in Turkiye in environment, energy and economy using life cycle assessment approach
    Temizyurek-Arslan, Merve
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 892