Variations in Cost and Readmissions of Patients in the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Bundle for Hip and Femur Fractures

被引:2
|
作者
Rose, Ryan Hunter [1 ]
Cherney, Steven M. [1 ]
Jensen, Hanna K. [2 ]
Karim, Saleema A. [3 ]
Mears, Simon C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 4301 West Markham, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Surg, Div Trauma & Acute Care Surg, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Fay W Boozman Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
bundled payment; hip fracture; femur fracture; hospital cost; readmission rate; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/21514593211049664
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) for hip and femur fractures is an effort to increase care quality and coordination at a lower cost. The bundle includes all patients undergoing an operative fixation of a hip or femur fracture (diagnosis-related group codes 480-482). This study aims to investigate variance in the hospital cost and readmission rates for patients within the bundle. Materials and Methods: The study is a retrospective analysis of patients >= 65 years old billed for a diagnosis-related groups 480-482 in 2016 in the National Readmission Database. Cost of admission and length of stay were compared between patients who were or were not readmitted. Regression analysis was used to determine the effects of the primary procedure code and anatomical location of the femur fracture on costs, length of stay, and readmission rates. Results: Patients that were readmitted within 90 days of surgery had an increased cost on initial admission ($18,427 vs $16,844, P < .0001), and an increased length of stay (6.24 vs 5.42, P < .0001). When stratified by procedure, patients varied in readmission rates (20.7% vs 19.6% vs 21.8%), initial cost, and length of stay (LOS). Stratification by anatomical location also led to variation in readmission rates (20.7% vs 18.3% vs 20.6%), initial cost, and LOS. Conclusion: The hip and femur fractures bundle includes a great number of procedures with variance in cost, readmission, and length of stay. This amount of variation may make standardization difficult and may put the hospital at potential financial risk.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost Analysis of Total Joint Arthroplasty Readmissions in a Bundled Payment Care Improvement Initiative
    Clair, Andrew J.
    Evangelista, Perry J.
    Lajam, Claudette M.
    Slover, James D.
    Bosco, Joseph A.
    Iorio, Richard
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (09): : 1862 - 1865
  • [2] Can Bundled Payment Improve Quality and Efficiency of Care for Patients with Hip Fractures?
    Antonova, Evgeniya
    Boye, Mark E.
    Sen, Namrata
    O'Sullivan, Amy K.
    Burge, Russel
    JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2015, 27 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [3] What Are the Cost Drivers for the Major Bowel Bundled Payment Care Improvement Initiative?
    Ricciardi, Rocco
    Moucharite, Marilyn A.
    Stafford, Caitlin
    Orangio, Guy
    Roberts, Patricia L.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (01) : 112 - 118
  • [4] Relationship between the Charlson Comorbidity Index and cost of treating hip fractures: implications for bundled payment
    Johnson D.J.
    Greenberg S.E.
    Sathiyakumar V.
    Thakore R.
    Ehrenfeld J.M.
    Obremskey W.T.
    Sethi M.K.
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2015, 16 (3) : 209 - 213
  • [5] Age and Frailty Influence Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Reimbursement in a Bundled Payment Care Improvement Initiative
    Pepper, Andrew M.
    Novikov, David
    Cizmic, Zlatan
    Barrett, John T.
    Collins, Michael
    Iorio, Richard
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    Long, William J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (07): : S80 - S83
  • [6] Target Price Adjustment for Hip Fractures Is Not Sufficient in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative
    Skibicki, Hope
    Yayac, Michael
    Krueger, Chad A.
    Courtney, P. Maxwell
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (01): : 47 - 53
  • [7] Is the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Feasible in Bundled Payment for Care Improvement in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients?
    Lawrie, Charles M.
    Abu-Amer, Wahid
    Barrack, Robert L.
    Clohisy, John C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (05): : 1179 - 1185
  • [8] Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative: The Next Evolution of Payment Formulations AAHKS Bundled Payment Task Force
    Froimson, Mark I.
    Rana, Adam
    White, Richard E., Jr.
    Marshall, Amanda
    Schutzer, Steve F.
    Healy, William L.
    Naas, Peggy
    Daubert, Gail
    Iorio, Richard
    Parsley, Brian
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (08): : 157 - 165
  • [9] Bundled Care for Hip Fractures: A Machine-Learning Approach to an Untenable Patient-Specific Payment Model
    Karnuta, Jaret M.
    Navarro, Sergio M.
    Haeberle, Heather S.
    Billow, Damien G.
    Krebs, Viktor E.
    Ramkumar, Prem N.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2019, 33 (07) : 324 - 330
  • [10] Robotic total knee arthroplasty: A missed opportunity for cost savings in Bundled Payment for Care Improvement initiatives?
    Shah, Rohan
    Diaz, Adrian
    Phieffer, Laura
    Quatman, Carmen
    Glassman, Andrew
    Hyer, J. Madison
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    SURGERY, 2021, 170 (01) : 134 - 139