Pain Management Telementoring, Long-term Opioid Prescribing, and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Objective Benefits of primary care provider (PCP) participation in pain management telementoring have been reported; however, no studies have examined within-patient changes in dose or discontinuation of long-term opioid therapy (LOT). The objectives of this nonrandomized study were to evaluate the relationship between telementoring participation and 1) LOT dose reduction and 2) LOT discontinuation and to 3) explore the relationship between LOT dose changes and patient-reported outcomes. Methods PCPs were recruited from a US Army medical center. Intervention group PCPs (N=12) attended telementoring sessions; control group providers (N=13) did not. Morphine equivalent daily doses (MEDD) for patients of study providers (N=396) were extracted from the study site's opioid database. The intervention group was subdivided based on number of sessions attended (i.e., active and low participation). Intent-to-treat and as-treated analyses were conducted using generalized estimating equations. Separate analyses evaluated the association between within-patient changes in MEDD and pain impact, depression, and anxiety (N=40). Results Intent-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in MEDD reduction; however, a higher proportion of patients of intervention PCPs discontinued LOT (25%3.6%) compared with control PCPs (16%+/- 3.6%, P<0.05). As-treated analyses revealed differences in MEDD reduction between active (13.2 +/- 3.0) and low-participating (2.6 +/- 3.0) PCPs (P<0.01). Further, a higher proportion of patients of actively participating PCPs discontinued LOT (29%+/- 4.9%) compared with control PCPs (16%+/- 3.6%, P=0.01). We found no evidence that decreased MEDD was associated with poorer self-reported outcomes within patients. Conclusions Pain management telementoring supports PCPs' efforts to reduce reliance on LOT for chronic pain management and highlights the need for actively engaged PCP pain champions.