Impact of sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension on the anterior compartment

被引:0
|
作者
Benedito de Castro, E. [1 ]
Palma, P. [1 ]
Riccetto, C. [1 ]
Herrmann, V. [1 ]
Bigozzi, M. A. [2 ]
Olivares, J. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Gynecol & Urol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Hosp Bernardino Rivadavia, Serv Ginecol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Policlin Bancaria, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2010年 / 34卷 / 01期
关键词
Sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension; Lower urinary tract symptoms; POP-Q; Cystocele; PELVIC SUPPORT DEFECTS; LIGAMENT SUSPENSION; ORGAN PROLAPSE; FIXATION; WOMEN; STANDARDIZATION; RECONSTRUCTION; HYSTERECTOMY; TERMINOLOGY; EVERSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: a prospective study was conducted to assess the efficacy of sacrospinous vaginal vault fixation and its impact on the anterior compartment. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q.) system was used to quantify pelvic organ prolapse in the apical and anterior vaginal compartments. Methods: fifty-eight patients underwent a procedure to correct apical prolapse from March 2003 to February 2006. Mean preoperative and postoperative POP-Q scores were respectively: Aa (+0.74; -1.45); Ba (+3.17; -1.36); C (+3.41; -7.71) (p<0.001). Results: cure rate was 93.1%. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation of the anterior vaginal compartment was respectively: stage 1 (5.2%; 48.3%), stage 2 (6.9%; 34.5%), stage 3 (74.1%; 5.2%), and stage 4 (13.8%; 0%). De novo cystocele occurred in 87.9% of cases. An improvement was seen in lower urinary tract symptoms of urgency, nocturia, and urge incontinence. Conclusions: sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension is effective for the treatment of apical prolapse and leads to formation of cystocele in most cases (C) 2009 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 110
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension for prolapse
    DeLancey, JOL
    Morley, GW
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (01): : 156 - 156
  • [2] Anterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension for prolapse
    Winkler, HA
    Tomeszko, JE
    Sand, PK
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (04): : 612 - 615
  • [3] SUCCESS WITH SACROSPINOUS SUSPENSION OF THE PROLAPSED VAGINAL VAULT
    BACKER, MH
    [J]. SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1992, 175 (05): : 419 - 420
  • [4] The sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: Critical analysis of outcomes
    Meschia M.
    Bruschi F.
    Amicarelli F.
    Pifarotti P.
    Marchini M.
    Crosignani P.G.
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 1999, 10 (3) : 155 - 159
  • [5] Anterior or posterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: Long-term anatomic and functional evaluation
    Goldberg, RP
    Tomezsko, JE
    Winkler, HA
    Koduri, S
    Culligan, PJ
    Sand, PK
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (02): : 199 - 204
  • [6] Infracoccygeal sacropexy or sacrospinous suspension for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse
    de Tayrac, R.
    Mathe, M. -L.
    Bader, G.
    Deffieux, X.
    Fazel, A.
    Fernandez, H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 100 (02) : 154 - 159
  • [7] Anterior or posterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: Long-term anatomic and functional evaluation - Reply
    Goldberg, RP
    Tomezsko, JE
    Winkler, HA
    Koduri, S
    Culligan, PJ
    Sand, PK
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02): : 344 - 344
  • [8] An in-line suturing device to simplify sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension
    Lind, LR
    Choe, J
    Bhatia, NN
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (01): : 129 - 132
  • [9] Necrotizing fasciitis as a complication after vaginal vault suspension to the sacrospinous ligament
    Roskar, Luka
    Lukanovic, David
    Gjorshevski, Ljupcho
    Meglic, Leon
    [J]. GAZZETTA MEDICA ITALIANA ARCHIVIO PER LE SCIENZE MEDICHE, 2022, 181 (1-2) : 95 - 98
  • [10] Anterior approach bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse
    Cespedes, RD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (6A) : 70 - 75