A scoping review of public building accessibility

被引:20
|
作者
Carlsson, G. [1 ]
Slaug, B. [1 ]
Schmidt, S. M. [1 ]
Norin, L. [1 ]
Ronchi, E. [2 ]
Gefenaite, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Fac Med, Dept Hlth Sci, POB 157, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Fire Safety Engn, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Environment design; ICF; Impairment; Participation; Person-environment fit; WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBILITY; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIERS; PEOPLE; FACILITIES; MOBILITY; FITNESS; DISABILITIES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101227
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The built environment needs to be designed so that all people can participate in the activities they want and need to do. Yet, accessibility is difficult to put into practice, and accessibility issues tend to be overlooked in the building and planning processes. Objectives: The aim of this scoping review was to summarize the research front in the area of accessibility to public buildings. Specific aims were to identify knowledge gaps, to identify access activities in relation to environmental features and to link to predominant activities in terms of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Inspec, Embase and Cochrane databases. Articles in English based on original empirical studies investigating accessibility of public buildings for adults aged >= 18 years with functional limitations were considered. Results: Of the 40 articles included, ten involved study participants, while 30 only examined buildings using instruments to assess accessibility. In addition, the psychometric properties were only tested for a few of them. All articles concerned mobility and several visual limitations, while few addressed cognitive or hearing limitations. Ten main access activities were identified, from using parking/drop-off area to exiting building. Conclusions: By using the ICF and theoretically relating the accessibility problems to activities, the results revealed that there are large knowledge gaps about accessibility to public buildings for older people and people with functional limitations and that there is a need for more methodological considerations in this area of research. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public Transport Accessibility for People With Disabilities: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Mwaka, Claudel R.
    Best, Krista L.
    Gamache, Stephanie
    Gagnon, Martine
    Routhier, Francois
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [2] Global interest in walking accessibility: a scoping review
    Merlin, Louis A.
    Jehle, Ulrike
    [J]. TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2023, 43 (05) : 1021 - 1054
  • [3] Public transport accessibility: A literature review
    Saif, Muhammad Atiullah
    Zefreh, Mohammad Maghrour
    Torok, Adam
    [J]. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 2019, 47 (01): : 36 - 43
  • [4] Analysis of the Legal System of Public Building Accessibility in Taiwan
    Chang, Chih-Yuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY, 2019, : S83 - S87
  • [5] Methods and measures to evaluate the impact of participatory model building on public policymakers: a scoping review protocol
    Henson, Rosie Mae
    Purtle, Jonathan
    Headen, Irene
    Stankov, Ivana
    Langellier, Brent A.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [6] Accessibility in Native Mobile Applications for Users with Disabilities: A Scoping Review
    Acosta-Vargas, Patricia
    Salvador-Acosta, Belen
    Salvador-Ullauri, Luis
    Villegas-Ch, William
    Gonzalez, Mario
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [7] What is public health? a scoping review
    Azari, Razieh
    Borisch, Bettina
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 81 (01)
  • [8] A Scoping Review of Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector
    Olumekor, Michael
    [J]. LEX LOCALIS-JOURNAL OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT, 2024, 22 (01): : 1 - 24
  • [9] What is public health? a scoping review
    Razieh Azari
    Bettina Borisch
    [J]. Archives of Public Health, 81
  • [10] Public Policy Diffusion: A Scoping Review
    Hassan Danaeefard
    Fatemeh Mahdizadeh
    [J]. Public Organization Review, 2022, 22 : 455 - 477