Sustainability of waste-to-hydrogen conversion pathways: A life cycle thinking-based assessment br

被引:26
|
作者
Wijayasekera, Sachindra Chamode [1 ]
Hewage, Kasun [1 ,4 ]
Hettiaratchi, Patrick [2 ]
Siddiqui, Osamah [1 ]
Razi, Faran [1 ]
Pokhrel, Dinesh [3 ]
Sadiq, Rehan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Okanagan Campus,1137 Alumni Ave, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Schulich Sch Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[3] POB 2100,Stn M, Calgary, AB T2P 2M5, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Okanagan Campus,EME4225-1137 Alumni Ave, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
关键词
Municipal solid waste; Waste; -to; -hydrogen; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Multicriteria decision -making; Waste-to-energy; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; RICH SYNGAS PRODUCTION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; STEAM GASIFICATION; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; BIOREACTOR LANDFILLS; PYROLYSIS; PERFORMANCE; FUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116218
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Waste-derived hydrogen (H2) has been identified as a clean energy source which could simultaneously abate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and avert municipal solid waste (MSW) from being deposited in perpetual landfills. In this study, four waste-to-hydrogen processes - gasification, pyrolysis, integrated pyrolysisgasification, and landfill bioreactor technology - are studied with MSW as feedstock. Following technological evaluations, life cycle assessment and life cycle costing are performed for different scenarios and configurations to evaluate their environmental footprint, levelized cost of H2, and energy return on investment. Finally, multicriteria decision-making was applied using the VIKOR method under four weighting schemes to evaluate the four processes under varying decision-making contexts. Gasification results in the highest H2 outputs and energy returns, whereas pyrolysis produces the lowest levelized cost due to its biochar by-product formation. Nevertheless, all four technologies proved to be performing optimally under different weightings of environmental, economic, and social elements, suggesting the versatility of the waste-to-hydrogen concept and its suitability to be applied in various decision-making contexts. The results and novelties of this study would contribute toward planning and investment decision-making in sustainable H2 production and clean energy.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of life cycle thinking-based methodologies in the development of waste management plans
    Cecere, Giuseppe
    Bottausci, Sara
    Degli Esposti, Anna
    Magrini, Chiara
    Mazzi, Anna
    Camana, Daniela
    Cappucci, Grazia Maria
    Demichelis, Francesca
    Miranda, Giovanni
    Carollo, Federica
    Sciarrone, Michela
    Fedele, Andrea
    Rigamonti, Lucia
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 173 : 109 - 117
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of waste-to-hydrogen systems for fuel cell electric buses in Glasgow, Scotland
    Lui, Jade
    Sloan, William
    Paul, Manosh C.
    Flynn, David
    You, Siming
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 359
  • [3] Life Cycle Thinking-Based Selection of Building Facades
    Saleem, Muhammad
    Chhipi-Shrestha, Gyan
    Andrade, Marco Tulio Barbosa
    Dyck, Roberta
    Ruparathna, Rajeev
    Hewage, Kasun
    Sadiq, Rehan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 24 (04)
  • [4] Sustainability performance of interior wall types used in Canada: a life cycle thinking-based comparison
    Patel, Kartik
    Ruparathna, Rajeev
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2023, 50 (11) : 936 - 947
  • [5] Conversion of food waste to energy: A focus on sustainability and life cycle assessment
    Sridhar, Adithya
    Kapoor, Ashish
    Kumar, Ponnusamy Senthil
    Ponnuchamy, Muthamilselvi
    Balasubramanian, Sivasamy
    Prabhakar, Sivaraman
    [J]. FUEL, 2021, 302
  • [6] Waste-to-energy and waste-to-hydrogen with CCS: Methodological assessment of pathways to carbon-negative waste treatment from an LCA perspective
    Materazzi, Massimiliano
    Chari, Suviti
    Sebastiani, Alex
    Lettieri, Paola
    Paulillo, Andrea
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 173 : 184 - 199
  • [7] Life cycle sustainability assessment of municipal waste management systems
    Schluchter, Wolf
    Rybaczewska-Blazejowska, Magdalena
    [J]. MANAGEMENT-POLAND, 2012, 16 (02): : 311 - 322
  • [8] Assessment of sustainability for the bioprocesses: Does it (really) follow life cycle thinking?
    Sablayrolles, Caroline
    Vaca-Garcia, Carlos
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2016, 10 (02): : 111 - 112
  • [9] Feasibility of carbon-capturing in building heating systems: A life cycle thinking-based approach
    Liyanage, Don Rukmal
    Hewage, Kasun
    Karunathilake, Hirushie
    Sadiq, Rehan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2024, 132
  • [10] Life cycle thinking-based energy retrofits evaluation framework for Canadian residences: A Pareto optimization approach
    Zhang, Haonan
    Hewage, Kasun
    Prabatha, Tharindu
    Sadiq, Rehan
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 204