Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening

被引:101
|
作者
Colflesh, Gregory J. H.
Conway, Andrew R. A.
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03196824
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
The controlled attention theory of working memory suggests that individuals with greater working memory capacity (WMC) are better able to control or focus their attention than individuals with lesser WMC. This relationship has been observed in a number of selective attention paradigms including a dichotic listening task (Conway, Cowan, & Bunting, 2001) in which participants were required to shadow words presented to one ear and ignore words presented to the other ear. Conway et al. found that when the participant's name was presented to the ignored ear, 65% of participants with low WMC reported hearing their name, compared to only 20% of participants with high WMC, suggesting greater selective attention on the part of high WMC participants. In the present study, individual differences in divided attention were examined in a dichotic listening task, in which participants shadowed one message and listened for their own name in the other message. Here we find that 66.7% of high WMC and 34.5% of low WMC participants detected their name. These results suggest that as WMC capacity increases, so does the ability to control the focus of attention, with high WMC participants being able to flexibly "zoom in" or "zoom out" depending on task demands.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 703
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening
    Gregory J. H. Colflesh
    Andrew R. A. Conway
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14 : 699 - 703
  • [2] Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation
    Bleckley, MK
    Durso, FT
    Crutchfield, JM
    Engle, RW
    Khanna, MM
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (04) : 884 - 889
  • [3] Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation
    M. Kathryn Bleckley
    Francis T. Durso
    Jerry M. Crutchfield
    Randall W. Engle
    Maya M. Khanna
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10 : 884 - 889
  • [4] Verbatim and gist memory and individual differences in inhibition, sustained attention, and working memory capacity
    Nieznanski, Marek
    Obidzinski, Michal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 31 (01) : 16 - 33
  • [5] PROCESSING CAPACITY AND SWITCHING ATTENTION IN DICHOTIC LISTENING
    MEWHORT, DJK
    THIO, H
    BIRKENMA.AC
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 25 (02): : 111 - &
  • [6] Individual differences in working memory capacity and attention, and their relationship with students’ approaches to learning
    Eva Kyndt
    Eduardo Cascallar
    Filip Dochy
    [J]. Higher Education, 2012, 64 : 285 - 297
  • [7] Individual differences in working memory capacity and attention, and their relationship with students' approaches to learning
    Kyndt, Eva
    Cascallar, Eduardo
    Dochy, Filip
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 64 (03) : 285 - 297
  • [8] Individual differences in working memory capacity and workload capacity
    Yu, Ju-Chi
    Chang, Ting-Yun
    Yang, Cheng-Ta
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [9] Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration
    Tuholski, SW
    Engle, RW
    Baylis, GC
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (03) : 484 - 492
  • [10] Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity
    Raghunath, Nisha
    Fournier, Lisa R.
    Kogan, Clark
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2021, 85 (05): : 1970 - 1985