Comparative study on the behavior of encased stone column and conventional stone column

被引:126
|
作者
Malarvizhi [1 ]
Ilamparuthi [1 ]
机构
[1] Anna Univ, Div Soil Mech & Fdn Engn, Madras 600025, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
coupled FE analysis; geogrid encasement; settlement reduction ratio; soft clay; stone column (IGC : E2/E13/E14/K3/K14/M9);
D O I
10.3208/sandf.47.873
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Stone columns, one of the most commonly used soil improvement techniques, have been utilized worldwide to increase bearing capacity and reduce total and differential settlements of structures constructed on soft clay. Stone columns also act as vertical drains, thus speeding up the process of consolidation. However, the settlement of stabilised bed is not reduced in many situations for want of adequate lateral restraint. Encasing the stone column with a geogrid enhances the bearing capacity and reduces the settlement drastically without compromising its effect as a drain, unlike a pile. The behavior of the encased stone column stabilized bed is experimentally investigated and analysed numerically. In the numerical analysis, material behaviour is simulated using Soft Soil, Mohr Coulomb and Geogrid models for clay, stone material and encasement respectively and is validated with experimental results. The parametric study carried out on varying the L/D ratio (L = length of the column; D = diameter of the column) of column, stiffness of geogrid and angle of internal friction of stone material gives a better understanding of the physical performance of the encased stone column stabilized clay bed.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 885
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Numerical Study of the Dynamic Response of Stone Column and Geosynthetic Encased Stone Column in Soft Clay
    Zheng, Yewei
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Ji, Mingchang
    GEO-CONGRESS 2023: FOUNDATIONS, RETAINING STRUCTURES, AND GEOSYNTHETICS, 2023, : 447 - 455
  • [2] Performance of stone column encased with geogrids
    Malarvizhi, S. N.
    Ilamparuthi, K.
    Soft Soil Engineering, 2007, : 309 - 314
  • [3] Comparison of Encased Stone Column with Conventional Column for Varied Parameters through Experimental and Numerical Investigations
    Sivapriya, S., V
    James, Jijo
    Pavithra, K.
    Renuka Devi, S.
    Sangeetha, K.
    Sasikala, M.
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2023, 2023
  • [4] A comparative study of seismic performance evaluation of stone column, micro-pile, and geosynthetic-encased stone column for liquefaction flowslide mitigation
    Muhammad Hamzah Fansuri
    Muhsiung Chang
    Hsu-Jen Lin
    Rina Rebut Rayhansah
    Togani Cahyadi Upomo
    Rini Kusumawardani
    City and Built Environment, 3 (1):
  • [5] Numerical analysis of geosynthetic encased stone column
    Murugesan, S.
    Rajagopal, K.
    GEOSYNTHETICS, VOLS 1-4, 2006, : 1681 - +
  • [6] Behavior of Geotextile-Encased Single Stone Column in Soft Soils
    Farah, Rowad Esameldin
    Nalbantoglu, Zalihe
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 45 (05) : 3877 - 3890
  • [7] Behavior of Geotextile-Encased Single Stone Column in Soft Soils
    Rowad Esameldin Farah
    Zalihe Nalbantoglu
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2020, 45 : 3877 - 3890
  • [8] Experimental study on behaviour of encased stone column with tyre chips as aggregates
    Mazumder, T.
    Rolaniya, A. K.
    Ayothiraman, R.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 25 (03) : 259 - 270
  • [9] Three Dimensional Numerical Study on Behavior of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Column Placed in Soft Soil
    Dar, Lateef Ahmad
    Shah, Mohammad Yousuf
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 39 (03) : 1901 - 1922
  • [10] Three Dimensional Numerical Study on Behavior of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Column Placed in Soft Soil
    Lateef Ahmad Dar
    Mohammad Yousuf Shah
    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2021, 39 : 1901 - 1922