Mid-Term Results of Two Different Fixation Methods for Chevron Osteotomy for Correction of Hallux Valgus

被引:5
|
作者
Komur, Baran [1 ]
Yilmaz, Baris [2 ]
Kaan, Erdem [3 ]
Yucel, Bulent [1 ]
Duymus, Tahir Mutlu [1 ]
Ozdemir, Guzelali [2 ]
Guler, Olcay [4 ]
机构
[1] Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training & Res Hosp, Turgut Ozal St 1, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training & Res Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Dr Ersin Arslan Training & Res Hosp, Gaziantep, Turkey
[4] Medipol Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY | 2018年 / 57卷 / 05期
关键词
bioabsorbable pins; cannulated screws; chevron osteotomy; fixation methods; hallux valgus; PINS;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2018.03.021
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We compared 2 different fixation methods (bioabsorbable pins and cannulated screws) after chevron osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus. We reviewed consecutive proximal chevron osteotomies in 80 patients (100 feet) performed by 2 surgeons. Of the 100 feet (80 patients), 48 feet (40 patients) were stabilized with bioabsorbable pins, and 52 feet (40 patients) were stabilized with cannulated screws. In the pin group. 8 patients were male (20%) and 32 were female (80%). In the screw group, 10 patients were male (25%) and 30 were female (75%). The mean patient age was 43.1 (range 24 to 60) years in the pin group and 43.5 (range 20 to 60) years in the cannulated screw group. The visual analog scale, intermetatarsal angle, and hallux valgus angle decreased significantly and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores increased significantly in all patients in both groups after surgery (p < .05). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups (p > .05). Both fixation methods were found to be safe and reliable under the appropriate conditions and when performed by an experienced surgeon. (C) 2018 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 909
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mid-term results of Scarf osteotomy in hallux valgus
    Renée A. Fuhrmann
    Hans Zollinger-Kies
    Hans-Peter Kundert
    [J]. International Orthopaedics, 2010, 34 : 981 - 989
  • [2] Mid-term results of Scarf osteotomy in hallux valgus
    Fuhrmann, Renee A.
    Zollinger-Kies, Hans
    Kundert, Hans-Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 34 (07) : 981 - 989
  • [3] Percutaneous Chevron Osteotomy in Treating Hallux Valgus: Hong Kong Experience and Mid-Term Results
    Karry, Lam Ka-Lee
    Siu-Wah, Kong
    Yuen-Hon, Chow
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 19 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [4] BIODEGRADABLE FIXATION IN CHEVRON OSTEOTOMY FOR HALLUX VALGUS
    HIRVENSALO, E
    BOSTMAN, O
    VAINIONPAA, S
    VIHTONEN, K
    ROKKANEN, P
    TORMALA, P
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1988, 59 (04): : 473 - 473
  • [5] The Retrocapital Osteotomy ("Chevron") for Correction of Splayfoot with Hallux Valgus
    Gabel, Michael
    [J]. OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2008, 20 (06): : 463 - 476
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Chevron Akin Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Correction
    Flaherty, Alexandra
    Chen, Jie
    [J]. JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [7] Percutaneous Transosseous Suture Fixation of the Akin Osteotomy and Minimally Invasive Chevron for Correction of Hallux Valgus
    Liszka, Henryk
    Gadek, Artur
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 41 (09) : 1079 - 1091
  • [8] A CHEVRON-AKIN DOUBLE OSTEOTOMY FOR CORRECTION OF HALLUX-VALGUS
    MITCHELL, LA
    BAXTER, DE
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE, 1991, 12 (01): : 7 - 14
  • [9] MID-TERM RESULTS FOLLOWING SUBCAPITAL METATARSAL OSTEOTOMY FOR TREATMENT OF HALLUX-VALGUS WITH METATARSUS PRIMUS VARUS
    BRETSCHNEIDER, W
    WANIVENHAUS, A
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 1995, 133 (01): : 55 - 60
  • [10] Chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: A meta-analysis
    Ma, Qiang
    Liang, Xiaojun
    Lu, Jun
    [J]. FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2019, 25 (06) : 755 - 760