MODERATING ROLE OF RESILIENCE: WHEN ABUSIVE SUPERVISION IMPACTS DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE AND EMPLOYEES' VOICE

被引:6
|
作者
Khan, Rizwan [1 ]
Siddiqui, Shakira Huma [2 ]
机构
[1] Air Univ, Sch Management Sci, Scholar Management Sci HRM, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Air Univ, Sch Management Sci, Adjunct Fac Management Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
Abusive supervision; Employees' Voice; Distributive Justice; Resilience; POSITIVE ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR; EMOTIONAL EXHAUSTION; MEDIATING ROLE; PSYCHOLOGICAL RESOURCES; WORK ENGAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; PERFORMANCE; LEADERS; SILENCE; SELF;
D O I
10.5281/zenodo.3596112
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to investigate the role played by abusive supervision in decreasing the voice of employees. This study tested the mediating role of distributive justice in the relationship between abusive supervision and employee's voice and moderating role of resilience in the relationship between abusive supervision and employee voice, and abusive supervision and distributive justice as well. A sample of 461 employees was contacted from 3S and 2S dealerships of automobiles sector of Pakistan. Using convenience sampling technique, data was collected through four structured questionnaires. Respondents duly filled in consent form for being participants of the study. To avoid variable biasedness Time Lag Technique was used for collecting data. Data Analyses were carried out by using SPSS and AMOS. Abusive supervision was found having negative impact on employees' voice. Perception of abusive supervision has a negative impact on perception of distributive justice which in turn decreases employees' voice. Resilience as a psychological resource has been found moderating the relationship between abusive supervision and employees' perception of distributive justice, and the relationship between abusive supervision and employees' voice. This study provides an insight to managers to figure out the adverse impact of abusive supervision on voice behaviors of employees. Abusive supervision works as a hurdle in voicing the silence of the subordinates. Mangers, therefore, need to take measures for discouraging abusive supervision in the work place. An abuse free organizational environment will induce employees to give their much-needed feedback and opinion in the organizational matters. Moreover, managers need to find ways to develop resilience in the employees as resilience like other components of PsyCap is a state which can be developed and strengthened. The present study investigates the supervisor's abusive behavior to be an obstacle in voicing the silence of subordinates. It provides evidence that distributive justice mediates the relationship between abusive supervision and employees' voice behaviors. This study broadens the understanding that how abusive supervision leads to employees' voice behaviors through mediation of distributive justice, moreover, the mitigating role of resilience, (a component of Psychological Capital), has been emphasized in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 469
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How and when does abusive supervision influence employees' promotive and prohibitive voice?
    Yang, Jun
    Wang, Xiao-Hua
    Treadway, Darren C. C.
    Liu, Yonghong
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (02) : 1457 - 1472
  • [2] How and when does abusive supervision influence employees’ promotive and prohibitive voice?
    Jun Yang
    Xiao-Hua (Frank) Wang
    Darren C. Treadway
    Yonghong Liu
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2024, 43 : 1457 - 1472
  • [3] Abusive Supervision and Employee Empowerment: The Moderating Role of Resilience and Workplace Friendship
    Arshad, Ayesha
    Sun, Peter Y. T.
    Desmarais, Fabrice
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 28 (04) : 479 - 494
  • [4] ABUSIVE SUPERVISION AND WORK PERFORMANCE: THE MODERATING ROLE OF ABUSIVE SUPERVISION VARIABILITY
    Zhou, Lian
    [J]. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2016, 44 (07): : 1089 - 1098
  • [5] When Core Self-Evaluations Influence Employees’ Deviant Reactions to Abusive Supervision: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Ability
    Donald H. Kluemper
    Kevin W. Mossholder
    Dan Ispas
    Mark N. Bing
    Dragos Iliescu
    Alexandra Ilie
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, 159 : 435 - 453
  • [6] When Core Self-Evaluations Influence Employees' Deviant Reactions to Abusive Supervision: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Ability
    Kluemper, Donald H.
    Mossholder, Kevin W.
    Ispas, Dan
    Bing, Mark N.
    Iliescu, Dragos
    Ilie, Alexandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2019, 159 (02) : 435 - 453
  • [7] The impact of employees' values on role engagement Assessing the moderating effects of distributive justice
    Rice, Bridget
    Fieger, Peter
    Rice, John
    Martin, Nigel
    Knox, Kathy
    [J]. LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (08) : 1095 - 1109
  • [8] Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: the mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance
    Wang, Wei
    Mao, Jiye
    Wu, Weiku
    Liu, Jun
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2012, 50 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [9] When subordinates respond constructively to abusive supervision: the moderating role of performance goal orientation
    Wang, Haizhen
    Wei, Li-qun
    Zhang, Ruoyong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 39 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [10] Engage or quit? The moderating role of abusive supervision between resilience, intention to leave and work engagement
    Dai, You-De
    Zhuang, Wen-Long
    Huan, Tzung-Cheng
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 70 : 69 - 77