Quantifying pupillary asymmetry through objective binocular pupillometry in the normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations

被引:12
|
作者
Truong, James Q. [1 ]
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Optometry, Dept Biol & Vis Sci, 33 West 42nd St, New York, NY 10036 USA
关键词
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI); pupil asymmetry; pupillometry; pupil light reflex (PLR); afferent pupillary defect (APD); anisocoria; SUBACUTE STAGE; ANISOCORIA; LIGHT;
D O I
10.1080/02699052.2016.1192220
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Little is known about human inter-ocular pupillary asymmetry (IOPA). Thus, the purpose of the present investigation was to assess objectively static and dynamic IOPA in normals and in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).Methods: The pupillary light reflex (PLR) was assessed in an adult population of normals and in those with mTBI using the Neuroptics DP-2000 binocular pupillometer. Four stimulus conditions were used to optimize the assessment. Two aspects of the pupil were assessed: baseline diameter prior to light stimulation and the dynamic amplitude of constriction following light stimulation.Results: There was no statistical difference in either the static or dynamic IOPA between the two groups. Thus, the data were combined for a better global parameter estimate. The mean average static IOPA was 0.26 mm (SD = 0.20 mm) or 4.17% (+/- 3.29%). The mean average dynamic IOPA was dependent on the light stimulus condition, with the average across all four test conditions being 0.11 mm (+/- 0.10 mm) or 1.84% (+/- 1.70%).Discussion: The inter-ocular pupillary effects of mTBI appear to be symmetrical rather than asymmetrical in nature. The findings provide clinicians and researchers a useful quantitative guideline to assess normal vs abnormal static and dynamic inter-ocular pupillary asymmetry (IOPA) in these two populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1372 / 1377
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Objective pupillary correlates of photosensitivity in the normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations
    Truong, James Q.
    Ciuffreda, Kenneth J.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [2] Comparison of pupillary dynamics to light in the mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and normal populations
    Truong, James Q.
    Ciuffreda, Kenneth J.
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2016, 30 (11) : 1378 - 1389
  • [3] Influence of refractive error on pupillary dynamics in the normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations
    Truong, James Q.
    Joshi, Nabin R.
    Ciuffreda, Kenneth J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY, 2018, 11 (02) : 93 - 102
  • [4] Objective Pupillary Correlates of Photosensitivity in the Normal and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Populations
    Truong, James Q.
    Ciuffreda, Kenneth J.
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 2016, 181 (10) : 1382 - 1390
  • [5] Geriatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
    McCulloch, Karen L.
    Osborne, Mary Beth A.
    Ramsey, Crystal R.
    [J]. CURRENT GERIATRICS REPORTS, 2020, 9 (03) : 142 - 153
  • [6] Geriatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
    Karen L. McCulloch
    Mary Beth A. Osborne
    Crystal R. Ramsey
    [J]. Current Geriatrics Reports, 2020, 9 : 142 - 153
  • [7] Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
    Bigler, Erin D.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 23 (03) : 169 - 209
  • [8] Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
    Erin D. Bigler
    [J]. Neuropsychology Review, 2013, 23 : 169 - 209
  • [9] Detection of Subclinical Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) Through Speech and Gait
    Talkar, Tanya
    Yuditskaya, Sophia
    Williamson, James R.
    Lammert, Adam C.
    Rao, Hrishikesh
    Hannon, Daniel
    O'Brien, Anne
    Vergara-Diaz, Gloria
    DeLaura, Richard
    Sturim, Douglas
    Ciccarelli, Gregory
    Zafonte, Ross
    Palmer, Jeffrey
    Bonato, Paolo
    Quatieri, Thomas F.
    [J]. INTERSPEECH 2020, 2020, : 135 - 139
  • [10] Diagnosis and Treatment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
    Ervin S. Batchelor
    [J]. Journal of Health Service Psychology, 2019, 45 (1) : 29 - 37