Multi-institutional Evaluation of Women at High Risk of Developing Breast Cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Hermel, David J. [1 ]
Wood, Marie E. [1 ]
Chun, Jennifer [2 ]
Rounds, Tiffany [1 ]
Sands, Melissa [1 ]
Schwartz, Shira [2 ]
Schnabel, Freya R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Hematol & Oncol, Given E214,89 Beaumont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Surg, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Chemoprevention; Data collaboration; High-risk registry; Risk assessment; Risk-reducing strategies; BILATERAL PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; REDUCING SURGERY; FAMILY-HISTORY; OVARIAN-CANCER; TAMOXIFEN; PREVENTION; IMPACT; CHEMOPREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To better understand the health practices of women with a moderate and high risk of breast cancer, we conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional analysis of 1035 women from 2 separate high-risk registries. Overall, we found high concordance of data between registries, low uptake of preventative strategies, and low stage but high-grade disease in the patients who developed cancer. Introduction: We performed the present study to better understand the practices and preferences of women with an elevated risk of breast cancer by merging the registries from 2 separate institutions and comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes. Materials and Methods: The data from women enrolled in institutional review boardapproved registries from 2003 to 2015 at the New York University Langone Medical Center and University of Vermont Medical Center were evaluated. We compared patient characteristics, risk factors, uptake of prevention methods, and cancer rates between the 2 registries. Results: A total of 1035 women were included in the present analysis. We found a 99% concordance of variables collected between the 2 registries. Significant differences were found in age, risk characteristics, uptake of prevention methods, and cancer rates between the 2 registries. The uptake of chemoprevention was low (8% for all women), with greater uptake among women with atypia found on biopsy examination (66%) than among those with a strong family history or BRCA mutations. Women with BRCA mutations accounted for 76% of those undergoing risk-reducing surgery. Of the 1035 women, 43 (4%) developed breast cancer. Of these, 86% were diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0 or 1 disease, 95% with tumors < 2 cm, and 70% with poor to moderately differentiated pathologic features. Only 1 of the women who developed breast cancer had been undergoing chemoprevention, and none had undergone previous prophylactic surgery. Conclusion: We found a high degree of concordance between registries, suggesting no barriers exist to multi-institutional collaboration. Overall, a low uptake of prevention opportunities was found in this high-risk population. Women developing breast cancer had predominantly low-stage but higher grade disease, which might suggest a benefit to participation in surveillance (or high-risk) programs.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-institutional evaluation of women at high-risk for developing breast cancer
    Wood, Marie
    Chun, Jennifer
    Rounds, Tiffany
    Schwartz, Shira
    Schnabel, Freya Ruth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [2] Multi-institutional evaluation of women at high-risk for developing breast cancer
    Wood, M.
    Schnabel, F.
    Chun, J.
    Schwartz, S.
    Rounds, T.
    Cuke, M.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [3] A Multi-institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Mueller, Alex
    Berglund, Ryan K.
    Ayyathurai, Raj
    Soloway, Cindy
    Soloway, Mark S.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Klein, Eric A.
    Jones, Steven J.
    Zappavigna, Chris
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 1635 - 1641
  • [4] A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Mueller, Alex
    Berglund, Ryan K.
    Ayyathurai, Raj
    Soloway, Cindy
    Soloway, Mark S.
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Klein, Eric A.
    Jones, Steven J.
    Zappavigna, Chris
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (01): : S19 - S25
  • [5] Multi-Institutional Validation of a Mammography-Based Breast Cancer Risk Model
    Yala, Adam
    Mikhael, Peter G.
    Strand, Fredrik
    Lin, Gigin
    Satuluru, Siddharth
    Kim, Thomas
    Banerjee, Imon
    Gichoya, Judy
    Trivedi, Hari
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Hughes, Kevin
    Sheedy, David J.
    Matthis, Lisa M.
    Karunakaran, Bipin
    Hegarty, Karen E.
    Sabino, Silvia
    Silva, Thiago B.
    Evangelista, Maria C.
    Caron, Renato F.
    Souza, Bruno
    Mauad, Edmundo C.
    Patalon, Tal
    Handelman-Gotlib, Sharon
    Guindy, Michal
    Barzilay, Regina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16) : 1732 - +
  • [6] Frequency of Breast Cancer Thoughts and Lifetime Risk Estimates: A Multi-Institutional Survey of Women Undergoing Screening Mammography
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Shelby, Rebecca A.
    Knippa, Emily E.
    Langman, Eun L.
    Miller, Lauren S.
    Whiteside, Beth A.
    Soo, Mary Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (10) : 1393 - 1400
  • [7] Re: A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Ayres, B. E.
    Bott, S. R. J.
    Barber, N. J.
    Langley, S. E. M.
    Montgomery, B. S. I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (03): : 1223 - 1224
  • [8] EVALUATION OF PROSTATE CANCER RISK CALCULATORS: A PROSPECTIVE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL IRISH STUDY
    Foley, R. W.
    Lundon, D. J.
    O'Brien, F.
    Galvin, D.
    Watson, R. W.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 182 : S494 - S494
  • [9] A Multi-institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer COMMENT
    Dall'Era, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 1641 - 1641
  • [10] Evaluation of the needs and concerns of partners of women at high risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer
    Mireskandari, S
    Meiser, B
    Sherman, K
    Warner, BJ
    Andrews, L
    Tucker, KM
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 15 (02) : 96 - 108