Sevoflurane-Remifentanil Versus Propofol- Remifentanil Anesthesia During Noncardiac Surgery for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease - A Prospective Study Between 2016 and 2017 at a Single Center

被引:3
|
作者
Dai, Zhongliang [1 ]
Lin, Miao [1 ]
Li, Yali [1 ]
Gao, Wenli [1 ]
Wang, Ping [1 ]
Lin, Juan [1 ]
Wan, Zhenzhen [2 ]
Jiang, Yuanxu [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Jinan Univ, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Clin Med Coll 2,Affiliated Hosp 1,Dept Anesthesio, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp Hubei Prov, Dept Anesthesiol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2021年 / 27卷
关键词
Acute Coronary Syndrome; Coronary Artery Disease; Propofol; ADVERSE CARDIAC EVENTS; VS; PROPOFOL; PROTECTION; REVASCULARIZATION; MAINTENANCE; MANAGEMENT; ISCHEMIA; INJURY; AGENTS; PHASE;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.929835
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Volatile anesthesia possesses cardioprotective properties, and it is widely used in patients undergoing coro-nary artery bypass surgery, but no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are available on the use of sevoflurane-remifentanil versus propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during noncardiac surgery. This study was designed to compare the 2 different types of general anesthesia in patients with CAD undergoing noncardiac surgery at a single center. Material/Methods: Patients with CAD undergoing noncardiac surgery were enrolled in an RCT conducted between March 2016 and December 2017. The participants were randomized to receive either sevoflurane-remifentanil or propofol-remi-fentanil anesthesia. The primary endpoint was occurrence of in-hospital cardiovascular events. The secondary endpoints included delirium, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), in-hospital morbidity and mortality, and hospital LOS. Results: A total of 164 participants completed the study (sevoflurane: 81; propofol: 83). The occurrence of in-hospital cardiovascular events did not differ between the 2 groups (42.6% vs 39.4%, P=0.86). The occurrence of delir-ium did not differ between the 2 groups after the operation. PONV had a higher frequency after sevoflurane anesthesia at 48 h compared with propofol. In-hospital morbidity and mortality, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS were similar between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). At 30 days after surgery, no between-group differences in car-diac morbidity and mortality were observed. Conclusions: In this study, anesthesia using sevoflurane-remifentanil did not provide additional postoperative cardioprotec-tion in comparison with propofol-remifentanil in patients with CAD undergoing noncardiac surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Sevoflurane-remifentanil versus propofol-remifentanil anesthesia at a similar bispectral level for off-pump coronary artery surgery: No evidence of reduced myocardial ischemia
    Law-Koune, Jean Dominique
    Raynaud, Catherine
    Liu, Ngai
    Dubois, Claude
    Romano, Mauro
    Fischler, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2006, 20 (04) : 484 - 492
  • [2] Induction of anaesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease: A comparison between sevoflurane-remifentanil and fentanyl-etomidate
    Wang, JYY
    Winship, SM
    Thomas, SD
    Gin, T
    Russell, GN
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1999, 27 (04) : 363 - 368
  • [3] Remifentanil-clonidine-propofol versus sufentanil-propofol anesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery
    Gerlach, K
    Uhlig, T
    Hüppe, M
    Kraatz, E
    Saager, L
    Schmitz, A
    Dörges, V
    Schmucker, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2002, 16 (06) : 703 - 708
  • [4] Microcirculation measured by vascular occlusion test during desflurane–remifentanil anesthesia is superior to that in propofol–remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized study
    Youn Joung Cho
    Jungil Bae
    Tae Kyong Kim
    Deok Man Hong
    Jeong-Hwa Seo
    Jae-Hyon Bahk
    Yunseok Jeon
    [J]. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2017, 31 : 989 - 997
  • [5] Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
    Yunlong Zhang
    Wendong Lin
    Sheliang Shen
    Hongfa Wang
    Xiaona Feng
    Jiehao Sun
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 17
  • [6] Randomized comparison of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil on the cardioprotective effects in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
    Zhang, Yunlong
    Lin, Wendong
    Shen, Sheliang
    Wang, Hongfa
    Feng, Xiaona
    Sun, Jiehao
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [7] Perioperative incidence of airway obstructive and hypoxemic events in patients with confirmed or suspected sleep apnea - a prospective, randomized pilot study comparing propofol/remifentanil and sevoflurane/remifentanil anesthesia
    Fassbender, Philipp
    Buergener, Silja
    Haddad, Ali
    Silvanus, Marie-Therese
    Peters, Juergen
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [8] Perioperative incidence of airway obstructive and hypoxemic events in patients with confirmed or suspected sleep apnea - a prospective, randomized pilot study comparing propofol/remifentanil and sevoflurane/remifentanil anesthesia
    Philipp Fassbender
    Silja Bürgener
    Ali Haddad
    Marie-Therese Silvanus
    Jürgen Peters
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 18
  • [9] Microcirculation measured by vascular occlusion test during desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia is superior to that in propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing thoracic surgery: subgroup analysis of a prospective randomized study
    Cho, Youn Joung
    Bae, Jungil
    Kim, Tae Kyong
    Hong, Deok Man
    Seo, Jeong-Hwa
    Bahk, Jae-Hyon
    Jeon, Yunseok
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2017, 31 (05) : 989 - 997
  • [10] Myocardial injury in remifentanil-based anaesthesia for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: an equipotent dose of sevoflurane versus propofol
    Kim, T. -Y.
    Kim, D. -K.
    Yoon, T-G.
    Lim, J. -A.
    Woo, N. -S.
    Chee, H. -K.
    Shin, J. -K.
    Song, M. -G.
    Kim, S. -H.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2011, 39 (03) : 418 - 425