Improving the spatial prediction of soil organic carbon using environmental covariates selection: A comparison of a group of environmental covariates

被引:100
|
作者
Zeraatpisheh, Mojtaba [1 ,2 ]
Garosi, Younes [3 ]
Owliaie, Hamid Reza [4 ]
Ayoubi, Shamsollah [3 ]
Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Ruhollah [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Scholten, Thomas [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Xu, Ming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ, Henan Key Lab Earth Syst Observat & Modeling, Kaifeng 475004, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ, Coll Geog & Environm Sci, Kaifeng 475004, Peoples R China
[3] Isfahan Univ Technol, Coll Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[4] Univ Yasuj, Coll Agr, Yasuj, Iran
[5] Univ Tubingen, Dept Geosci Soil Sci & Geomorphol, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
[6] Univ Tubingen, SFB 1070 ResourceCultures, Gartenstr 29, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
[7] Univ Tubingen, DFG Cluster Excellence Machine Learning, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Soil organic carbon; Spatial prediction; Environmental covariates; Time-series vegetation indices; Machine learning; Uncertainty; DATA-MINING TECHNIQUES; LAND-USE CHANGE; TOPOGRAPHY; NITROGEN; MATTER; REGION; FOREST; MANAGEMENT; FERTILITY; NORTHEAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.catena.2021.105723
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In the digital soil mapping (DSM) framework, machine learning models quantify the relationship between soil observations and environmental covariates. Generally, the most commonly used covariates (MCC; e.g., topographic attributes and single-time remote sensing data, and legacy maps) were employed in DSM studies. Additionally, remote sensing time-series (RST) data can provide useful information for soil mapping. Therefore, the main aims of the study are to compare the MCC, the monthly Sentinel-2 time-series of vegetation indices dataset, and the combination of datasets (MCC + RST) for soil organic carbon (SOC) prediction in an arid agroecosystem in Iran. We used different machine learning algorithms, including random forest (RF), Cubist, support vector machine (SVM), and partial least square regression (PLSR). A total of 237 soil samples at 0-20 cm depths were collected. The 5-fold cross-validation technique was used to evaluate the modeling performance, and 50 bootstrap models were applied to quantify the prediction uncertainty. The results showed that the Cubist model performed the best with the MCC dataset (R-2 = 0.35, RMSE = 0.26%) and the combined dataset of MCC and RST (R-2 = 0.33, RMSE = 0.27%), while the RF model showed better results for the RST dataset (R-2 = 0.10, RMSE = 0.31%). Soil properties could explain the SOC variation in MCC and combined datasets (66.35% and 50.82%, respectively), while NDVI was the most controlling factor in the RST (50.22%). Accordingly, results showed that time-series vegetation indices did not have enough potential to increase SOC prediction accuracy. However, the combination of MCC and RST datasets produced SOC spatial maps with lower uncertainty. Therefore, future studies are required to explicitly explain the efficiency of time-series remotely-sensed data and their interrelationship with environmental covariates to predict SOC in arid regions with low SOC content.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using environmental covariates to predict soil organic carbon stocks in Vertisols of Sudan
    Ahmed, Ibrahim S.
    Hassan, Faroug A.
    Sulieman, Magboul M.
    Keshavarzi, Ali
    Elmobarak, Abdelmagid A.
    Yousif, Khozima M.
    Brevik, Eric C.
    [J]. GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2022, 31
  • [2] Spatial prediction of soil depth using environmental covariates by quantile regression forest model
    M. Lalitha
    S. Dharumarajan
    Amar Suputhra
    B. Kalaiselvi
    Rajendra Hegde
    RS. Reddy
    CR. Shiva Prasad
    CS. Harindranath
    BS. Dwivedi
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193
  • [3] Spatial prediction of soil depth using environmental covariates by quantile regression forest model
    Lalitha, M.
    Dharumarajan, S.
    Suputhra, Amar
    Kalaiselvi, B.
    Hegde, Rajendra
    Reddy, RS.
    Prasad, CR. Shiva
    Harindranath, CS.
    Dwivedi, BS.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (10)
  • [4] Predictive soil mapping based on the similarity of environmental covariates using a spatial convolutional autoencoder
    Su, Li
    Zhang, Meiyu
    Wang, Bing
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2023, 87 (03) : 631 - 643
  • [5] Selection of Environmental Covariates for Classifier Training Applied in Digital Soil Mapping
    Campos, Alcinei Ribeiro
    Giasson, Elvio
    Ferreira Costa, Jose Janderson
    Machado, Israel Rosa
    da Silva, Elisangela Benedet
    Bonfatti, Benito Roberto
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2018, 42
  • [6] Digital assessments of soil organic carbon storage using digital maps provided by static and dynamic environmental covariates
    Shirazi, Fatemeh Rahbar Alam
    Shahbazi, Farzin
    Rezaei, Hossein
    Biswas, Asim
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 39 (02) : 948 - 974
  • [7] Incorporating forest canopy openness and environmental covariates in predicting soil organic carbon in oak forest
    Su, Lei
    Heydari, Mehdi
    Jaafarzadeh, Maryam Sadat
    Mousavi, Seyed Roohollah
    Rezaei, Meisam
    Fathizad, Hassan
    Heung, Brandon
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2024, 244
  • [8] Selection of training samples for updating conventional soil map based on spatial neighborhood analysis of environmental covariates
    Gao, Hong
    Zhang, Xinyue
    Wang, Liangjie
    He, Xianglin
    Shen, Feixue
    Yang, Lin
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2020, 366
  • [9] Combination of MIR spectroscopy and environmental covariates to predict soil organic carbon in a semi-arid region
    Sabetizade, Marmar
    Gorji, Manouchehr
    Roudier, Pierre
    Zolfaghari, Ali Asghar
    Keshavarzi, Ali
    [J]. CATENA, 2021, 196
  • [10] Genomic selection using random regressions on known and latent environmental covariates
    Tolhurst, Daniel J.
    Gaynor, R. Chris
    Gardunia, Brian
    Hickey, John M.
    Gorjanc, Gregor
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2022, 135 (10) : 3393 - 3415