Written Feedback on Design: A Comparison of Students and Educators

被引:0
|
作者
Cardella, Monica E. [1 ]
Diefes-Dux, Heidi A. [1 ]
Marbouti, Farshid [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Engn Educ, Neil Armstrong Hall Engn,701 W Stadium Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
design education; first-year engineering; feedback; ENGINEERING DESIGN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Design students improve their understanding of design, their design skills, and their design project work through experience and through feedback. Feedback might come from other students ( i.e. peer reviews), educators, end users, and other stakeholders. In this paper, we focus on two of these groups: other students and educators. We investigate the differences between the types of feedback that educators provide compared to the types of feedback that students provide in peer reviews. To accomplish this, we asked 19 educators and 120 first-year engineering students to independently provide feedback on the same sample student work. Our findings suggest that there are both quantitative and qualitative differences between educators' and students' feedback; compared to the students, educators provided a greater number of comments, provided longer comments, and exhibited different patterns in terms of the Focus and Substance of the feedback. In addition to our findings, we discuss our approach for helping educators and students develop their ability to give productive feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1491
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Written feedback provided by first-year engineering students, undergraduate teaching assistants, and educators on design project work
    Marbouti, Farshid
    Mendoza-Garcia, John
    Diefes-Dux, Heidi A.
    Cardella, Monica E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (1-2) : 179 - 195
  • [2] A guide to nursing students' written reflections for students and educators
    Naber, Jessica
    Markley, Liz
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2017, 25 : 1 - 4
  • [3] Comparison of Written versus Verbal Peer Feedback for Design Projects
    Carberry, Adam R.
    Brunhaver, Samantha R.
    Csavina, Kristine R.
    McKenna, Ann F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2016, 32 (03) : 1458 - 1471
  • [4] Improving students' narrative feedback to educators
    Peterson, John
    Chow, Candace
    Bonnett, Rachel
    Colbert-Getz, Jorie
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 54 (05) : 477 - 478
  • [5] Giving students effective written feedback
    Bamkin, Sam
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (01) : 125 - 129
  • [6] Engineers' Written Feedback on Design
    Marbouti, Farshid
    Diefes-Dux, Heidi A.
    Cardella, Monica E.
    Shafaat, Ali
    [J]. 2016 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2016,
  • [7] Characterizing mathematics teacher educators' written feedback to prospective teachers
    Kastberg, Signe E.
    Lischka, Alyson E.
    Hillman, Susan L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION, 2020, 23 (02) : 131 - 152
  • [8] Characterizing mathematics teacher educators’ written feedback to prospective teachers
    Signe E. Kastberg
    Alyson E. Lischka
    Susan L. Hillman
    [J]. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2020, 23 : 131 - 152
  • [9] Comparison of Audio vs. Written Feedback on Clinical Assignments of Nursing Students
    Bourgault, Annette M.
    Mundy, Cynthia
    Joshua, Thomas
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 34 (01) : 43 - 46
  • [10] A comparison of written feedback and written plus verbal feedback methods in performance management
    Erdemli, Cigdem
    Somer, H. Canan
    Bilgic, Reyhan
    [J]. TURK PSIKOLOJI DERGISI, 2007, 22 (60): : 71 - +