New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma

被引:226
|
作者
Paiva, Bruno [1 ]
van Dongen, Jacques J. M. [2 ]
Orfao, Alberto [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra Clin, Ctr Invest Med Aplicada, Pamplona, Spain
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Immunol, Med Ctr, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Salamanca, Canc Res Ctr Inst Biol Celular & Mol, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain
[4] Univ Salamanca, Cancer Consejo Super Invest Cientif, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain
[5] Univ Salamanca, Dept Med Cytometry Serv, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain
[6] Univ Salamanca, Inst Biosanitario Salamanca, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain
关键词
STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; MULTIPARAMETER FLOW-CYTOMETRY; LENALIDOMIDE PLUS DEXAMETHASONE; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION; TIME QUANTITATIVE PCR; FREE LIGHT-CHAIN; ASO RQ-PCR; AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION; CONSOLIDATION THERAPY;
D O I
10.1182/blood-2014-11-568907
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) is becoming standard diagnostic care for potentially curable neoplasms such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In multiple myeloma (MM), the majority of patients will inevitably relapse despite achievement of progressively higher complete remission (CR) rates. Novel treatment protocols with inclusion of antibodies and small molecules might well be able to further increase remission rates and potentially also cure rates. Therefore, MRD diagnostics becomes essential to assess treatment effectiveness. This review summarizes reports from the past 2 decades, which demonstrate that persistent MRD by multiparameter flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography, predicts significantly inferior survival among CR patients. We describe the specific features of currently available techniques for MRD monitoring and outline the arguments favoring new criteria for response assessment that incorporate MRD levels. Extensive data indicate that MRD information can potentially be used as biomarker to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment strategies, help on treatment decisions, and act as surrogate for overall survival. The time has come to address within clinical trials the exact role of baseline risk factors and MRD monitoring for tailored therapy in MM, which implies systematic usage of highly sensitive, cost-effective, readily available, and standardized MRD techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:3059 / 3068
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Role of minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma
    Szalat, Raphael E.
    Anderson, Kenneth C.
    Munshi, Nikhil C.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2024, 109 (07) : 2049 - 2059
  • [2] Role of minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma
    Szalat, Raphael E.
    Anderson, Kenneth C.
    Munshi, Nikhil C.
    REVISTA CHILENA DE LITERATURA, 2024, (109): : 2049 - 2059
  • [3] International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma
    Kumar, Shaji
    Paiva, Bruno
    Anderson, Kenneth C.
    Durie, Brian
    Landgren, Ola
    Moreau, Philippe
    Munshi, Nikhil
    Lonial, Sagar
    Blade, Joan
    Mateos, Maria-Victoria
    Dimopoulos, Meletios
    Kastritis, Efstathios
    Boccadoro, Mario
    Orlowski, Robert
    Goldschmidt, Hartmut
    Spencer, Andrew
    Hou, Jian
    Chng, Wee Joo
    Usmani, Saad Z.
    Zamagni, Elena
    Shimizu, Kazuyuki
    Jagannath, Sundar
    Johnsen, Hans E.
    Terpos, Evangelos
    Reiman, Anthony
    Kyle, Robert A.
    Sonneveld, Pieter
    Richardson, Paul G.
    McCarthy, Philip
    Ludwig, Heinz
    Chen, Wenming
    Cavo, Michele
    Harousseau, Jean-Luc
    Lentzsch, Suzanne
    Hillengass, Jens
    Palumbo, Antonio
    Orfao, Alberto
    Rajkumar, S. Vincent
    Miguel, Jesus San
    Avet-Loiseau, Herve
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (08): : E328 - E346
  • [4] Prognostic value of minimal residual disease response assessment in multiple myeloma
    Takamatsu, Hiroyuki
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 : 25 - 25
  • [5] RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE MONITORING
    Paiva, Bruno
    Vidriales, Maria-Belen
    Montalban, Maria-Angeles
    Blade, Joan
    Lahuerta, Juan-Jose
    Orfao, Alberto
    San Miguel, Jesus F.
    CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY, 2011, 80B (06) : 390 - 390
  • [6] Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Impact on Response Assessment, Prognosis and Tumor Heterogeneity
    Berger, Natalie
    Kim-Schulze, Seunghee
    Parekh, Samir
    BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE AND SYSTEMIC CANCER, 2018, 1100 : 141 - 159
  • [7] Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in the Context of Multiple Myeloma Treatment
    Nishihori, Taiga
    Song, Jinming
    Shain, Kenneth H.
    CURRENT HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY REPORTS, 2016, 11 (02) : 118 - 126
  • [8] Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in the Context of Multiple Myeloma Treatment
    Taiga Nishihori
    Jinming Song
    Kenneth H. Shain
    Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, 2016, 11 : 118 - 126
  • [9] Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Multiple Myeloma Patients: Minimal Disease With Maximal Implications
    Charalampous, Charalampos
    Kourelis, Taxiarchis
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [10] The role of minimal residual disease evaluation for patients with multiple myeloma
    Eun, Yoon Sang
    Kim, Hyun-Young
    Cho, Duck
    Kim, Seok Jin
    Kim, Kihyun
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2023, 23 : S80 - S80