A Comparative Study of the Application of Different Commercial Software for Topology Optimization

被引:20
|
作者
Tyflopoulos, Evangelos [1 ]
Steinert, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
topology optimization; commercial software; design; lightweighting; DESIGN; CODE;
D O I
10.3390/app12020611
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Topology optimization (TO) has been a popular design method among CAD designers in the last decades. This method optimizes the given design domain by minimizing/maximizing one or more objective functions, such as the structure's stiffness, and at the same time, respecting the given constraints like the volume or the weight reduction. For this reason, the companies providing the commercial CAD/FEM platforms have taken this design trend into account and, thus, have included TO in their products over the last years. However, it is not clear which features, algorithms, or, in other words, possibilities the CAD designers do have using these software platforms. A comparative study among the most applied topology optimization software was conducted for this research paper. First, the authors developed an online database of the identified TO software in the form of a table. Interested CAD designers can access and edit its content, contributing in this way to the creation of an updated library of the available TO software. In addition, a deeper comparison among three commercial software platforms-SolidWorks, ANSYS Mechanical, and ABAQUS-was implemented using three common case studies-(1) a bell crank lever, (2) a pillow bracket, and (3) a small bridge. These models were designed, optimized, and validated numerically, as well as compared for their strength. Finally, the above software was evaluated with respect to optimization time, optimized designs, and TO possibilities and features.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Practical aspects of commercial composite topology optimization software development
    Thomas, HL
    Zhou, M
    Shyy, YK
    Pagaldipti, N
    TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION OF STRUCTURES AND COMPOSITE CONTINUA, 2000, 7 : 269 - 278
  • [2] Application of topology optimization to commercial vehicle cab design
    Wang Deng-feng
    Zhang Bin
    Chen Jing
    Wang Shan-po
    Liu Shen-qiang
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEASURING TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS AUTOMATION, VOL II, 2009, : 763 - +
  • [3] Comparative study of topology optimization techniques
    Patel, Neal M.
    Tillotson, Donald
    Renaud, John E.
    Tovar, Andres
    Izui, Kazuhiro
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2008, 46 (08) : 1963 - 1975
  • [4] Stiffness design of heterogeneous periodic beam by topology optimization with integration of commercial software
    Yi, Sinan
    Cheng, Gengdong
    Xu, Liang
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2016, 172 : 71 - 80
  • [5] Comparative study of the commercial software for sound quality analysis
    Shin, Sung-Hwan
    ACOUSTICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 29 (03) : 221 - 228
  • [6] Stress-Constrained Topology Optimization for Commercial Software: A Python']Python Implementation for ABAQUS®
    Fernandes, Pedro
    Ferrer, Alex
    Goncalves, Paulo
    Parente, Marco
    Pinto, Ricardo
    Correia, Nuno
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (23):
  • [7] A Comparative Study of the Formulations for Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms
    Deepak, Sangamesh R.
    Sahu, Deepak
    Dinesh, M.
    Jalan, Salil
    Ananthasuresh, G. K.
    DETC 2008: 32ND ANNUAL MECHANISMS AND ROBOTICS CONFERENCE, VOL. 2, PTS A & B, 2009, : 205 - 216
  • [8] A study of the in-practice application of a commercial software architecture
    Barrow, R
    Frampton, K
    Hamilton, M
    Crossman, B
    2005 Australian Software Engineering Conference, Proceedings, 2005, : 292 - 301
  • [9] Comparison study of some commercial structural optimization software systems
    Wook-han Choi
    Jong-moon Kim
    Gyung-Jin Park
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54 : 685 - 699
  • [10] Comparison study of some commercial structural optimization software systems
    Choi, Wook-han
    Kim, Jong-moon
    Park, Gyung-Jin
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2016, 54 (03) : 685 - 699