Assessment of Five Pesticides as Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Effects on Estrogen Receptors and Aromatase

被引:15
|
作者
Gea, Marta [1 ]
Zhang, Chao [2 ]
Tota, Roberta [1 ]
Gilardi, Gianfranco [2 ]
Di Nardo, Giovanna [2 ]
Schiliro, Tiziana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Torino, Dept Publ Hlth & Pediat, I-10126 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Torino, Dept Life Sci & Syst Biol, I-10123 Turin, Italy
关键词
estrogen receptors; aromatase; pesticides; estrogenic activity; gene reporter assay; endocrine-disrupting chemicals; neonicotinoids; estrogen synthesis; estrogen signaling; estrogen equivalency factor; RISK-ASSESSMENT; EXPOSURE; NEONICOTINOIDS; IDENTIFICATION; METABOLISM; ANDROGEN; WATERS; ASSAYS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19041959
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Pesticides are widely applied all over the world, and pesticide exposure can induce different biological effects posing a possible threat to human health. Due to their effects on the endocrine system, some pesticides are classified as endocrine disruptors. The aim of the study is to assess the interference of five pesticides on estrogen biosynthesis and estrogen signaling. Three neonicotinoid insecticides (Acetamiprid, Clothianidin, and Thiamethoxam), a carbamate insecticide (Methiocarb) and a herbicide (Oxadiazon) were tested. The effect of pesticides on estrogen biosynthesis was studied through an ELISA assay using a recombinant form of human aromatase, the enzyme that catalyzes the transformation of androgens to estrogens. Moreover, the effect of pesticides on estrogen signaling was assessed using a gene reporter assay on MELN cells, which measures estrogen receptor-mediated estrogenic activity. The results of the ELISA assay showed that the pesticides did not alter aromatase activity (no interference with estrogen biosynthesis), while the results of the gene reporter assay showed that only Methiocarb was able to alter estrogen signaling at high doses. The estrogenic activity of Methiocarb, expressed as 17 beta-estradiol equivalency factor (EEF), was equal to 8.0 x 10(-8). In conclusion, this study suggested that Methiocarb should be considered a potential endocrine disruptor.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and their effects on puberty
    Lopez-Rodriguez, David
    Franssen, Delphine
    Heger, Sabine
    Parent, Anne-Simone
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2021, 35 (05)
  • [2] Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on the Ovary
    Patel, Shreya
    Zhou, Changqing
    Rattan, Saniya
    Flaws, Jodi A.
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2015, 93 (01)
  • [3] Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals
    Gore, Andrea C.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (11) : 1705 - 1706
  • [4] Risk assessment of the endocrine-disrupting effects of nine chiral pesticides
    Song, Qin
    Zhang, Yi
    Yan, Lu
    Wang, Jinghua
    Lu, Chensheng
    Zhang, Quan
    Zhao, Meirong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2017, 338 : 57 - 65
  • [5] Endocrine-disrupting chemicals
    Kiess, Wieland
    Haeusler, Gabriele
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2021, 35 (05)
  • [6] Endocrine-disrupting chemicals
    Bertram, Michael G.
    Gore, Andrea C.
    Tyler, Charles R.
    Brodin, Tomas
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (13)
  • [7] Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals
    Friedrich, M. J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (15): : 1578 - 1578
  • [8] Assessment and Molecular Actions of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals That Interfere with Estrogen Receptor Pathways
    Kerdivel, Gwenneg
    Habauzit, Denis
    Pakdel, Farzad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 2013
  • [9] The evidence base for the assessment of endocrine-disrupting chemicals: a comment on the EU criteria for pesticides and biocides
    Bozzini, Emanuela
    [J]. EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2021, 17 (04): : 729 - 739
  • [10] Review of the effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in birds
    Giesy, JP
    Feyk, LA
    Jones, PD
    Kannan, K
    Sanderson, T
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2003, 75 (11-12) : 2287 - 2303