Mechanism of RNA stabilization and translational activation by a pentatricopeptide repeat protein

被引:227
|
作者
Prikryl, Jana [1 ]
Rojas, Margarita [1 ]
Schuster, Gadi [2 ]
Barkan, Alice [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Inst Mol Biol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Biol, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
mitochondria; plastid; RNA binding protein; RNA processing; PRE-MESSENGER-RNA; GENE-EXPRESSION; ACID RESPONSE; CHLAMYDOMONAS; BINDING; ENCODES; IDENTIFICATION; ACCUMULATION; RECOGNITION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1012076108
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins comprise a large family of helical repeat proteins that bind RNA and modulate organellar RNA metabolism. The mechanisms underlying the functions attributed to PPR proteins are unknown. We describe in vitro studies of the maize protein PPR10 that clarify how PPR10 modulates the stability and translation of specific chloroplast mRNAs. We show that recombinant PPR10 bound to its native binding site in the chloroplast atpI-atpH intergenic region (i) blocks both 5'-> 3' and 3'-> 5 exoribonucleases in vitro; (ii) is sufficient to define the native processed atpH mRNA 5'-terminus in conjunction with a generic 5'-> 3' exoribonuclease; and (iii) remodels the structure of the atpH ribosome-binding site in a manner that can account for PPR10's ability to enhance atpH translation. In addition, we show that the minimal PPR10-binding site spans 17 nt. We propose that the site-specific barrier and RNA remodeling activities of PPR10 are a consequence of its unusually long, high-affinity interface with single-stranded RNA, that this interface provides a functional mimic to bacterial small RNAs, and that analogous activities underlie many of the biological functions that have been attributed to PPR proteins.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 420
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A pentatricopeptide repeat protein is essential for RNA editing in chloroplasts
    Emi Kotera
    Masao Tasaka
    Toshiharu Shikanai
    Nature, 2005, 433 : 326 - 330
  • [2] A pentatricopeptide repeat protein is essential for RNA editing in chloroplasts
    Kotera, E
    Tasaka, M
    Shikanai, T
    NATURE, 2005, 433 (7023) : 326 - 330
  • [3] Specific RNA Recognition by Designer Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein
    Shen, Cuicui
    Wang, Xiang
    Liu, Yexing
    Li, Quanxiu
    Yang, Zhao
    Yan, Nieng
    Zou, Tingting
    Yin, Ping
    MOLECULAR PLANT, 2015, 8 (04) : 667 - 670
  • [4] Structure of a PLS-class Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein Provides Insights into Mechanism of RNA Recognition
    Ban, Ting
    Ke, Jiyuan
    Chen, Runze
    Gu, Xin
    Tan, M. H. Eileen
    Zhou, X. Edward
    Kang, Yanyong
    Melcher, Karsten
    Zhu, Jian-Kang
    Xu, H. Eric
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 288 (44) : 31540 - 31548
  • [5] Identification and characterization of the RNA binding surface of the pentatricopeptide repeat protein
    Kobayashi, Keiko
    Kawabata, Masuyo
    Hisano, Keizo
    Kazama, Tomohiko
    Matsuoka, Ken
    Sugita, Mamoru
    Nakamura, Takahiro
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (06) : 2712 - 2723
  • [6] Development of translational activation tool using designer PPR (Pentatricopeptide Repeat) proteins
    Ping, N.
    Kuge, S.
    Tamura, T.
    Nakamura, T.
    HUMAN GENE THERAPY, 2021, 32 (19-20) : A71 - A71
  • [7] A pentatricopeptide repeat protein is a site recognition factor in chloroplast RNA editing
    Okuda, Kenji
    Nakamura, Takahiro
    Sugita, Mamoru
    Shimizu, Toshiyuki
    Shikanai, Toshiharu
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 281 (49) : 37661 - 37667
  • [8] The potential for manipulating RNA with pentatricopeptide repeat proteins
    Yagi, Yusuke
    Nakamura, Takahiro
    Small, Ian
    PLANT JOURNAL, 2014, 78 (05): : 772 - 782
  • [9] Chloroplast RNA Editing by Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins
    Mach, Jennifer
    PLANT CELL, 2009, 21 (01): : 17 - 17
  • [10] The evolution of RNA editing and pentatricopeptide repeat genes
    Fujii, Sota
    Small, Ian
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2011, 191 (01) : 37 - 47