Renewable methan - A technology evaluation by multi-criteria decision making from a European perspective

被引:35
|
作者
Billig, E. [1 ]
Thraen, D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Permoserstr 15, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Deutsch Biomasseforschungszentrum DBFZ, Torgauer Str 116, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Biomethane; Bio-SNG; Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); STRAW; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.164
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Natural gas (NG), as one fossil fuel with multiple applications, plays a major role in Europe. However, to face global climate change and accelerate the transition to a sustainable society, fossil fuels, such as NG have to be replaced in the long term. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the technical and economic aspects of emerging technology concepts for the production of renewable methane from biomass. Biochemical and thermochemical concepts are considered within the scope of this paper. To evaluate the different conversion technologies an adapted AHP (analytic hierarchy process) was developed, based on two methods AHP and utility value analysis. In total, 99 alternatives (bio- and thermochemical conversion) were evaluated. From the multi-criteria analysis, no single technology pathway was given preference. However, the choice of substrate was found to be a critical factor in comparing the technology options. Within biochemical conversion, organic waste alternatives were favoured, for the thermochemical conversion, residual forest wood. The goal, a comprehensive comparison of two different conversion pathways on a multi-criteria scale, was achieved, and has thus provided added value for the bioeconomy and bio-refinery in research and policy aspects. Further, the methodology is expandable and transferable to other criteria and technologies. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 484
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Renewable Energy Preferences of European Countries and Türkiye: Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Ozsoy, Ferda Nakipoglu
    Ecemis, Orhan
    Ozpolat, Asli
    [J]. SMART GRIDS AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [2] A novel multi-criteria decision-making combining Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory technique for technology evaluation
    Shen, Yung-Chi
    Lin, Grace T. R.
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    [J]. FORESIGHT, 2012, 14 (02): : 139 - 153
  • [3] An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources
    Celikbilek, Yakup
    Tuysuz, Fatih
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 115 : 1246 - 1258
  • [4] A Multi-Criteria Approach to Decision Making in Broadband Technology Selection
    Marco Araújo
    Love Ekenberg
    Mats Danielson
    João Confraria
    [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2022, 31 : 387 - 418
  • [5] A Multi-Criteria Approach to Decision Making in Broadband Technology Selection
    Araujo, Marco
    Ekenberg, Love
    Danielson, Mats
    Confraria, Joao
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2022, 31 (02) : 387 - 418
  • [6] Multi-criteria decision making with overlapping criteria
    Abdulla, Mohammed Shahid
    [J]. IIMB MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 24 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [7] Multi-criteria models with trend evaluation in decision making support
    Bodnarova, Agata
    Gavalec, Martin
    Mls, Karel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS 2011, PTS I AND II, 2011, : 47 - 52
  • [8] Elicitation, Evaluation and Recommendation in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Process
    Tchangani, Ayeley P.
    Peres, Francois
    [J]. 2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, DECISION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (CODIT), 2017, : 1107 - 1112
  • [9] A review of multi-criteria decision making applications for renewable energy site selection
    Shao, Meng
    Han, Zhixin
    Sun, Jinwei
    Xiao, Chengsi
    Zhang, Shulei
    Zhao, Yuanxu
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 157 : 377 - 403
  • [10] Multi-Criteria Spatial Decision Making Supportsystem for Renewable Energy Development in Kazakhstan
    Mukhamediev, Ravil, I
    Mustakayev, Renat
    Yakunin, Kirill
    Kiseleva, Sophia
    Gopejenko, Viktor
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 122275 - 122288