Randomized trial of liberal versus restrictive guidelines for red blood cell transfusion in preterm infants

被引:312
|
作者
Bell, EF
Strauss, RG
Widness, JA
Mahoney, LT
Mock, DM
Seward, VJ
Cress, GA
Johnson, KJ
Kromer, IJ
Zimmerman, MB
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Biochem & Mol Biochem, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[5] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Pediat, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
anemia; brain; erythrocyte; preterm infants; transfusions;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2004-1884
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective. Although many centers have introduced more restrictive transfusion policies for pre-term infants in recent years, the benefits and adverse consequences of allowing lower hematocrit levels have not been systematically evaluated. The objective of this study was to determine if restrictive guidelines for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions for preterm infants can reduce the number of transfusions without adverse consequences. Design, Setting, and Patients. We enrolled 100 hospitalized preterm infants with birth weights of 500 to 1300 g into a randomized clinical trial comparing 2 levels of hematocrit threshold for RBC transfusion. Intervention. The infants were assigned randomly to either the liberal- or the restrictive-transfusion group. For each group, transfusions were given only when the hematocrit level fell below the assigned value. In each group, the transfusion threshold levels decreased with improving clinical status. Main Outcome Measures. We recorded the number of transfusions, the number of donor exposures, and various clinical and physiologic outcomes. Results. Infants in the liberal- transfusion group received more RBC transfusions (5.2 +/- 4.5 [mean +/- SD] vs 3.3 +/- 2.9 in the restrictive-transfusion group). However, the number of donors to whom the infants were exposed was not significantly different (2.8 +/- 2.5 vs 2.2 +/- 2.0). There was no difference between the groups in the percentage of infants who avoided transfusions altogether (12% in the liberal-transfusion group versus 10% in the restrictive-transfusion group). Infants in the restrictive-transfusion group were more likely to have intraparenchymal brain hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia, and they had more frequent episodes of apnea, including both mild and severe episodes. Conclusions. Although both transfusion programs were well tolerated, our finding of more frequent major adverse neurologic events in the restrictive RBC-transfusion group suggests that the practice of restrictive transfusions may be harmful to preterm infants.
引用
收藏
页码:1685 / 1691
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized trial of liberal versus restrictive guidelines for red blood cell transfusion in preterm infants
    Boedy, RF
    Mathew, OP
    PEDIATRICS, 2005, 116 (04) : 1048 - 1049
  • [2] Randomized trial of liberal versus restrictive guidelines for red blood cell transfusion in preterm infants - Reply
    Bell, EF
    Strauss, RG
    Widness, JA
    PEDIATRICS, 2005, 116 (04) : 1049 - 1050
  • [3] Red blood cell transfusion in preterm infants: restrictive versus liberal policy
    Chirico, Gaetano
    Beccagutti, Federica
    Sorlini, Annamaria
    Motta, Mario
    Perrone, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 : 20 - 22
  • [4] Restrictive Versus Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Bassler, Dirk
    Weitz, Marcus
    Bialkowski, Anja
    Poets, Christian F.
    CURRENT PEDIATRIC REVIEWS, 2008, 4 (03) : 143 - 150
  • [5] ACUTE PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RED BLOOD CELL TRANSFUSION IN PRETERM INFANTS TRANSFUSED USING LIBERAL OR RESTRICTIVE GUIDELINES
    Frederickson, Laura K.
    Cress, Gretchen A.
    Bell, Edward F.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2009, 66 (04) : 478 - 478
  • [6] Liberal Versus Restrictive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Thresholds in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Randomized, Open Label, Phase III, Noninferiority Trial
    Tay, Jason
    Allan, David S.
    Chatelain, Elizabeth
    Coyle, Doug
    Elemary, Mohamed
    Fulford, Adrienne
    Petrcich, William
    Ramsay, Timothy
    Walker, Irwin
    Xenocostas, Anargyros
    Tinmouth, Alan
    Fergusson, Dean
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (13) : 1463 - +
  • [7] Red blood cell transfusions in preterm infants: Is there a difference between restrictive and liberal criteria?
    Swamy, RS
    Embleton, ND
    PEDIATRICS, 2006, 117 (01) : 257 - 258
  • [8] The best strategy for red blood cell transfusion in severe burn patients, restrictive or liberal: A randomized controlled trial
    Salehi, Seyed Hamid
    Daniali, Maziar
    Motaghi, Paniz
    Momeni, Mahnoush
    BURNS, 2021, 47 (05) : 1038 - 1044
  • [9] Surgery: Restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion
    Huynh K.
    Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2018, 15 (1) : 2 - 2
  • [10] Post-Operative Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion: Liberal Versus Restrictive
    Hareuveni, M.
    Sagy, Y.
    Meilik, A.
    TRANSFUSION, 2013, 53 : 55A - 55A