Knowledge brokerage needs in building care robotics innovation ecosystems and networks

被引:1
|
作者
Parjanen, Satu [1 ]
Hennala, Lea [1 ]
Pekkarinen, Satu [1 ]
Melkas, Helina [1 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Lahti Univ Technol LUT, Sch Engn Sci, Lahti Campus,Mukkulankatu 19, FI-15210 Lahti, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Knowledge; brokerage; innovation ecosystem; innovation network; care robotics; HEALTH; PERSPECTIVES; PROXIMITY; CREATION;
D O I
10.1080/09654313.2021.1998386
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the ecosystem and network perspectives on innovation, cooperation between various actors is seen as essential to innovation. Because of several factors known to hinder cooperation, the literature has pointed out the need for knowledge brokerage functions. This paper investigates knowledge brokerage needs in building care robotics innovation ecosystems and networks in Finland. The research questions are as follows: What are macro-, meso- and micro-level brokerage needs, functions and roles in care robotics innovation ecosystems and networks, and what kinds of knowledge should be brokered at these different levels? The data were collected with multilevel interviews, including interviewees representing different interests and fields of expertise. Based on the results, there is a need for brokerage functions in emerging ecosystems and networks to create operational conditions, bring disparate actors together, manage innovation processes, create learning possibilities and share best practices. However, the brokerage needs to vary by level, indicating that the functions and roles of the brokers and brokered knowledge may be emphasized differently. At the macro level, system-level knowledge is needed, at the meso level, knowledge related to innovation process management and user knowledge is needed, and at the micro level, the need for experimental and tacit knowledge is highlighted.
引用
收藏
页码:1942 / 1961
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Data, information and knowledge in regional innovation networks Quality considerations and brokerage functions
    Melkas, Helina
    Harmaakorpi, Vesa
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2008, 11 (01) : 103 - +
  • [2] Knowledge building in innovation networks: The impact of collaborative tools
    Business Administration Department, University of Namur, Belgium
    [J]. Proc. Eur. Conf. Knowl. Manage., ECKM, 2006, (99-107):
  • [3] Social brokerage and productivity of users in online innovation networks
    Mukherjee, Satyam
    Jain, Tarun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 40 (02) : 231 - 254
  • [4] A Holistic Model of Building Innovation Ecosystems
    Rabelo, Ricardo J.
    Bernus, Peter
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (03): : 2250 - 2257
  • [5] EMERGING TECHNO-ECOSYSTEMS: KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS THAT SHAPE URBAN INNOVATION SPACES
    Garcia, Blanca C.
    Rodriguez, Alejandra L.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH KNOWLEDGE CITIES WORLD SUMMIT: KNOWLEDGE-BASED SERVICES (KCWS 2014), 2014, : 45 - 56
  • [6] Abstract Knowledge and Reified Financial Innovation: Building Wisdom and Ethics Into Financial Innovation Networks
    David Rooney
    Tom Mandeville
    Tim Kastelle
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 118 : 447 - 459
  • [7] Abstract Knowledge and Reified Financial Innovation: Building Wisdom and Ethics Into Financial Innovation Networks
    Rooney, David
    Mandeville, Tom
    Kastelle, Tim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 118 (03) : 447 - 459
  • [8] Building Consensus: Idea Brokerage in Teacher Policy Networks
    Galey-Horn, Sarah
    Reckhow, Sarah
    Ferrare, Joseph J.
    Jasny, Lorien
    [J]. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2020, 57 (02) : 872 - 905
  • [9] Platform for Knowledge Society and Innovation Ecosystems
    Mercier-Laurent, Eunika
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, AI4KM 2018, 2020, 588 : 34 - 47
  • [10] Knowledge complexity and brokerage in inter-city networks
    Carlos Bianchi
    Pablo Galaso
    Sergio Palomeque
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2023, 48 : 1773 - 1799