The Effect of Medial Branch Block on Postoperative Residual Pain Relieve After Percutaneous Kyphoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 12-Month Follow-up

Background: Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is a minimally invasive technique, and effective treatment, for an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). Residual back pain is the most common complication of PKP. Medial branch block (MBB) is a treatment option for painful OVCF, it can break the vicious cycle to release short-or long-term pain. Objectives: We aimed to determine the effects of MBB on postoperative residual back pain in OVCF patients after PKP surgery. Study Design: A randomized, controlled, single-center trial. Setting: Medical university center and local hospitals. Methods: A total of 198 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to either the MBB or Non-MBB group. In the MBB group, patients received MBB during PKP surgery, the injection contained a mixture of lidocaine and budesonide. The Non-MBB group was injected with normal saline in the target nerve area during PKP surgery. The primary outcome was back pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and residual back pain was defined as a VAS score greater than or equal to 4. The secondary outcomes included physical function assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF) and satisfaction with surgery was assessed using the S6 satisfaction scale. All parameters were measured at baseline, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3, 6, and 12 months after the intervention. Results: A total of 179 patients, including 91 patients in the MBB group and 88 patients in the Non-MBB group, were included for a comprehensive assessment. The VAS score in the MBB group was significantly lower than in the Non-MBB group within a one-month follow-up. PROMIS PF score in the MBB group was significantly higher than in the Non-MBB group within a one-month follow-up. The incidence of residual back pain in the MBB group was lower than the Non-MBB group within a one-month follow-up. The MBB group had a significantly higher satisfaction rate compared with the Non-MBB group at final follow-up. Limitations: Firstly, patients are from a single institution and the sample size is small. Secondly, some of the potential factors which may lead to back pain, such as infection, new symptomatic compression fracture, and serious cement leakage, did not occur. Thirdly, the conservative treatment group is not included. Finally, we were unable to determine individual differences in pain tolerance. Conclusions: MBB can effectively relieve back pain and reduce the incidence of residual back pain in OVCF patients after PKP surgery. Besides, it can also significantly improve postoperative physical function and patients' satisfaction with treatment.