Assessing efficacy in clinical trials of treatments for multiple sclerosis - Issues and controversy

被引:12
|
作者
Waubant, EL [1 ]
Goodkin, DE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,MT ZION MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CTR,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94115
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00023210-199606060-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
No single sensitive clinical outcome measure is capable of reliably reflecting the broad spectrum of clinical manifestations seen in multiple sclerosis (MS). Disease activity in groups of patients with MS is more readily detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spinal card than by neurological examination, However, the appearance of new lesions and progression of total lesion area as detected by MRI fails to predict reliably sustained progression of neurological impairment in individual patients, For this reason MRI is accepted as a primary outcome measure in exploratory clinical trials, while sustained progression of neurological impairment is the preferred primary outcome measure for pivotal phase II/III trials that lead to the approval of new treatments for MS. A comparison of proportions of patients meeting treatment failure as defined by discrete data at a specified time has previously been used in clinical trials of treatments for MS. Fewer patients may be needed to detect treatment effects when treatment failure is defined by continuous data that are analysed in a time-to-failure framework, Also, it may be possible to have nurses or trained technicians, rather than clinicians, administer tests that are continuous measures of neurological function. It is anticipated that recommendations provided by the Task Force on Clinical Outcomes for MS sponsored by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society of the US will include new multidimensional disease-specific composite outcome measures that better reflect the broad range of clinical expression and activity MS. However, it is unclear whether investigators are prepared to abandon neurologist-based ratings as the principal method for determining disease severity and response to treatment. More sensitive clinical outcomes may improve the predictive validity of certain MRT, techniques and facilitate expeditious testing of promising therapies in trials involving fewer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 473
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis: methodological issues
    Comi, G
    Filippi, M
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2005, 18 (03) : 245 - 252
  • [2] Value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing efficacy in clinical trials of multiple sclerosis therapies
    Erickson, BJ
    Noseworthy, JH
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 72 (11) : 1080 - 1089
  • [3] Review of methodological issues of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis
    Montalban, Xavier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 311 : S35 - S42
  • [4] Assessing blinding methodology in multiple sclerosis clinical trials
    Scalfari, A.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 2006, 12 : S92 - S92
  • [5] EXPANDED CLINICAL-TRIALS OF TREATMENTS FOR MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    WHITAKER, JN
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1993, 34 (06) : 755 - 756
  • [6] INCLUSION OF MINORITY POPULATIONS IN CLINICAL TRIALS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS TREATMENTS
    Lai, T. C.
    Meado, W. R.
    Wheeler, Y.
    Ngorsuraches, S.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2023, 19 (03): : 566 - 566
  • [7] Assessing treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis trials and in the clinical setting
    Tur, Carmen
    Moccia, Marcello
    Barkhof, Frederik
    Chataway, Jeremy
    Sastre-Garriga, Jaume
    Thompson, Alan J.
    Ciccarelli, Olga
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2018, 14 (02) : 75 - 93
  • [8] Assessing treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis trials and in the clinical setting
    Carmen Tur
    Marcello Moccia
    Frederik Barkhof
    Jeremy Chataway
    Jaume Sastre-Garriga
    Alan J. Thompson
    Olga Ciccarelli
    [J]. Nature Reviews Neurology, 2018, 14 : 75 - 93
  • [9] Clinical efficacy issues in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: update of natalizumab
    Patti, Francesco
    Pappalardo, Angelo
    [J]. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2009, 1 : 45 - 51
  • [10] Assessing Repair in Multiple Sclerosis: Outcomes for Phase II Clinical Trials
    Sormani, Maria Pia
    Pardini, Matteo
    [J]. NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2017, 14 (04) : 924 - 933