The Relational Dimensions of Procedural Fairness in a Tribunal Setting

被引:0
|
作者
MacDermott, Therese [1 ]
Meyerson, Denise [1 ]
Mackenzie, Catriona [2 ]
Moon, Danielle [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Law Sch, N Ryde, NSW, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, Dept Philosophy, N Ryde, NSW, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION | 2022年 / 31卷 / 03期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
JUSTICE; MODEL; VOICE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
People's understanding of fair treatment in their interactions with legal and other authorities has been the subject of influential cross jurisdictional research in social psychology. This research has shown that people's procedural fairness judgements are influenced by the quality of their interactions with authorities. People feel fairly treated when authorities convey trustworthiness and neutrality, and listen to them and treat them with respect, because such treatment conveys a relational message about equal status in the community. This article discusses the findings of an empirical case study which involved interviews with a group of Tribunal Members. The aim was to investigate how they translate the legal rules of procedural fairness into practice. The findings show that the interviewed Members are attuned to both the relational concerns identified in the social psychology literature and the normative dimensions of procedural fairness when they implement the legal rules in their procedural practices.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 184
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Procedural fairness as it applies in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
    Jarvis, D. G.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL, 2007, 81 (07): : 465 - 477
  • [2] Reputational implications of procedural fairness for personal and relational self-esteem
    De Cremer, David
    Sedikides, Constantine
    [J]. BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 30 (01) : 66 - 75
  • [3] Procedural fairness for radiotherapy priority setting in a low resource context
    DeBoer, Rebecca J.
    Nguyen, Cam
    Mutoniwase, Esperance
    Ho, Anita
    Umutesi, Grace
    Bigirimana, Jean Bosco
    Triedman, Scott A.
    Shyirambere, Cyprien
    [J]. BIOETHICS, 2022, 36 (05) : 500 - 510
  • [4] Procedural fairness in lotteries assigning initial roles in a dynamic setting
    Grimalda, Gianluca
    Kar, Anirban
    Proto, Eugenio
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 19 (04) : 819 - 841
  • [5] Procedural fairness in lotteries assigning initial roles in a dynamic setting
    Gianluca Grimalda
    Anirban Kar
    Eugenio Proto
    [J]. Experimental Economics, 2016, 19 : 819 - 841
  • [6] Procedural decisions by the arbitral tribunal
    Philip, A
    [J]. PLANNING EFFICIENT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: LAW APPLICABLE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 1996, (07): : 374 - 379
  • [7] The psychology of procedural fairness
    Jamieson, Philip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 19 (02):
  • [8] The Self in Procedural Fairness
    Sedikides, Constantine
    Hart, Claire M.
    De Cremer, David
    [J]. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2008, 2 (06): : 2107 - 2124
  • [9] PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND THE CORONER
    Freckelton, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2018, 26 (01) : 7 - 22
  • [10] Procedural incidents on the composition of the arbitral tribunal
    Mihai, Gabriel
    [J]. PERSPECTIVELE DREPTULUI NATIONAL SI EUROPEAN IN CONTEXTUAL PROVOCARILOR COMPLEXE ALE SOCIETATII CONTEMPORANE, 2016, : 116 - 122