A Comparison of the Feasibility and Safety of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy With the Conventional Radical Hysterectomy

被引:38
|
作者
Espino-Strebel, Elizabeth E. [1 ]
Luna, Jericho Thaddeus P. [1 ]
Domingo, Efren J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Philippine Gen Hosp, Sect Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 7 W 12th Ave, Manila 1400, Philippines
关键词
Radical hysterectomy; Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy; Bladder dysfunction;
D O I
10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181f165f2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Radical hysterectomy has been the treatment of choice for early-stage cervical cancer. Since its introduction in oncology, modifications to the original technique were made to enhance feasibility, improve cure rate, and decrease postoperative complications. Among these are the identification and preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves, known as the nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (RH). This retrospective study was conducted to compare the nerve-sparing with the conventional RH in terms of feasibility and safety, including bladder dysfunction and perioperative and postoperative complications and morbidities. Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven early-stage cervical carcinoma, cervical carcinoma with central tumor recurrence or persistence after primary radiotherapy, and endometrial carcinoma with cervical involvement treated with RH with or without nerve-sparing technique were included. The perioperative and postoperative complications and bladder function of these patients were analyzed. Results: Ninety-seven patients with early-stage cervical cancer and 24 patients with clinical stage II endometrial cancer underwent RH with or without nerve-sparing technique in a nonrandomized fashion. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 procedures in terms of duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and morbidity. Patients who underwent the nerve-sparing approach had a statistically significant earlier return of bladder function, with a mean of 9.4 days for the cervical cancer cases (vs 21 days in the nonYnerve-sparing group) and a mean of 8.5 days for the endometrial cancer cases (vs 22.6 days in the non-nerve-sparing group). Conclusions: The technique of sparing the pelvic autonomic nerves during RH for earlystage cervical cancer and clinical stage II endometrial cancer is comparable to the conventional method in terms of perioperative complications and morbidity, but is more favorable in terms of return of bladder function.
引用
收藏
页码:1274 / 1283
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Feasibility and technique
    Magrina, Javier F.
    Pawlina, Wojciech
    Kho, Rosanne M.
    Magtibay, Paul M.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (03) : 605 - 609
  • [2] Extended nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
    Kato, T
    Utsugi, K
    Kobayashi, Y
    Umezawa, S
    Hasumi, K
    Takizawa, K
    [J]. Proceedings of the XIX Asian and Oceanic Congress of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005, : 269 - 273
  • [3] EXTENDED NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY
    Kato, T.
    Tsukada, T.
    Yoneoka, Y.
    Kato, M.
    Tanase, Y.
    Uno, M.
    Ishikawa, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A230 - A230
  • [4] Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy
    Neto, J. S.
    Siufi, D. F. S.
    Magrina, J. F.
    [J]. MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2015, 67 (03): : 281 - 287
  • [5] Comparison of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy and Radical Hysterectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xue, Zhuowei
    Zhu, Xiaolu
    Teng, Yincheng
    [J]. CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 38 (05) : 1841 - 1850
  • [6] A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients
    Barton, DPJ
    Butler-Manuel, SA
    Buttery, LDK
    A'Hern, RP
    Polak, JM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2002, 12 (03) : 319 - 319
  • [7] A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Guidelines and feasibility in Western patients
    Trimbos, JB
    Maas, CP
    Deruiter, MC
    Peters, AAW
    Kenter, GG
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2001, 11 (03) : 180 - 186
  • [8] Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
    Makowski, Marcin
    Nowak, Marek
    Szpakowski, Marian
    Wladzinski, Jacek
    Serwach-Nowinska, Anna
    Janas, Lukasz
    Wilczynski, Jacek R.
    [J]. MENOPAUSE REVIEW-PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY, 2014, 13 (03): : 180 - 185
  • [9] Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A pilot study
    Raspagliesi, F
    Ditto, A
    Kusamura, S
    Fontanelli, R
    Spatti, G
    Solima, E
    Zanaboni, F
    Carcangiu, ML
    [J]. TUMORI, 2003, 89 (05) : 497 - 501
  • [10] Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer
    Jarruwale, Phanida
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    Benavides, Doris R.
    Su, Hsuan
    Lee, Chyi-Long
    [J]. GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2013, 2 (02): : 42 - 47