Performance of Digital Screening Mammography Among Older Women in the United States

被引:24
|
作者
Henderson, Louise M. [1 ]
O'Meara, Ellen S. [2 ]
Braithwaite, Dejana [3 ]
Onega, Tracy [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Grp Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Community & Family Med, Hanover, NH USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
digital mammography; sensitivity; specificity; cancer-detection rate; positive predictive value; breast cancer; older women; screening; PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER; TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS; REPLACEMENT THERAPY; COMMUNITY PRACTICE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; AGE; DENSITY; SENSITIVITY; ACCURACY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.29214
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDAlthough healthy women aged 65 years have a life expectancy of 20 years, there is a paucity of data on the performance of digital screening mammography among these women. The authors examined the performance and outcomes of digital screening mammography among a national group of women aged 65 years. METHODSFrom Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium data for the years 2005 to 2011, the authors included 296,496 full-field digital screening mammograms among 133,042 women ages 65 years without a history of breast cancer. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV1), recall rates, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated across the spectrum of age and breast density. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare mammography accuracy, cancer-detection rates (CDRs), and tumor characteristics by age and breast density. RESULTSMultivariate analyses revealed a significant decrease in the recall rate with age (P for linear trend [P-trend]<.001) and significant increases in specificity, PPV1, and CDR with age (P-trend<.001, P-trend<.001, and P-trend=.01, respectively). Sensitivity did not vary significantly with age. Among women with cancer, the proportion with invasive disease increased with age from 76% at ages 65 to 74 years to 81% at ages 80 years. There was a higher proportion of late stage cancers and positive lymph nodes among women ages 65 to 74 years compared with women in the older age groups. CONCLUSIONSThe specificity, PPV1, recall rate, and CDR of digital screening mammography improved with increased age. In addition, as age increased, the proportion of women with invasive versus ductal carcinoma in situ rose, whereas the proportion of women with positive lymph nodes decreased. Cancer 2015;121:1379-1386. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. The specificity, positive predictive value, recall rate, and cancer-detection rate of digital screening mammography all improve with increasing age. The current results indicate that, as age increases, the proportion of women with invasive breast cancer versus ductal carcinoma in situ rises, whereas the proportion of women with positive lymph nodes decreases.
引用
收藏
页码:1379 / 1386
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening Mammography Among Older Women: A Review of United States Guidelines and Potential Harms
    Mack, Deborah S.
    Lapane, Kate L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 28 (06) : 820 - 826
  • [2] Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States
    Bahl, Manisha
    Pinnamaneni, Niveditha
    Mercaldo, Sarah
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (03) : 582 - 590
  • [3] Estimating Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis After Screening Mammography Among Older Women in the United States
    Richman, Ilana B.
    Long, Jessica B.
    Soulos, Pamela R.
    Wang, Shi-Yi
    Gross, Cary P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 176 (09) : 1172 - +
  • [4] Estimating Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis After Screening Mammography Among Older Women in the United States Response
    Richman, Ilana B.
    Gross, Cary P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 177 (03) : 403 - 404
  • [5] Screening mammography remains effective among older women
    Murphy, Brittany
    Habermann, Elizabeth
    Glasgow, Amy
    Conners, Amy
    Boughey, Judy
    Degnim, Amy
    Rutten, Lilia Finney
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : 183 - 184
  • [6] Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older
    Michielutte, R
    Sharp, PC
    Foley, KL
    Cunningham, LE
    Spangler, JG
    Paskett, ED
    Case, LD
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (02) : 149 - 162
  • [7] Current Attitudes and Practices Around Screening Mammography Among Women in the United States: Results of a National Survey
    Mia Djulbegovic
    Jenerius Aminawung
    Jessica R. Hoag
    Kelly A. Kyanko
    Xiao Xu
    Susan H. Busch
    Cary P. Gross
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 1802 - 1804
  • [8] Current Attitudes and Practices Around Screening Mammography Among Women in the United States: Results of a National Survey
    Djulbegovic, Mia
    Aminawung, Jenerius
    Hoag, Jessica R.
    Kyanko, Kelly A.
    Xu, Xiao
    Busch, Susan H.
    Gross, Cary P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (06) : 1802 - 1804
  • [9] RECRUITING OLDER WOMEN FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY
    HALABI, S
    VOGEL, VG
    BONDY, ML
    VERNON, SW
    [J]. CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 1993, 17 (03): : 359 - 365
  • [10] Screening Mammography in Older Women A Review
    Walter, Louise C.
    Schonberg, Mara A.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (13): : 1336 - 1347