Genomic Landscape and Endocrine-Resistant Subgroup in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Progesterone Receptor-Negative, and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

被引:25
|
作者
Liu, Xi-Yu [1 ]
Ma, Ding [1 ]
Xu, Xiao-En [1 ]
Jin, Xi [1 ]
Yu, Ke-Da [1 ]
Jiang, Yi-Zhou [1 ]
Shao, Zhi-Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
THERANOSTICS | 2018年 / 8卷 / 22期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ER+PR-HER2-; endocrine resistance; multiomic; non-luminal-like; breast cancer; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS; S6; KINASE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; POOR-PROGNOSIS; THERAPY; TAMOXIFEN; TRIPLE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.7150/thno.29164
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (ER+PR-HER2-) breast cancer comprise a special type of breast cancer that constitutes similar to 10% of all breast cancer patients. ER+PR-HER2- tumor benefits less from endocrine therapy, while its genomic features remain elusive. In this study, we systematically assessed the multiomic landscape and endocrine responsiveness of ER+PR-HER2- breast cancer. Methods: This study incorporated five cohorts. The first and second cohorts were from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (n=130,856) and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (n=1,055) for analyzing survival outcomes and endocrine responsiveness. The third cohort was from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n=630) for multiomic analysis and endocrine-resistant subgroup exploration. The fourth cohort, from the MD Anderson database (n=92), was employed to assist gene selection. The fifth cohort was a prospective observational cohort from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (n=245) that was utilized to validate the gene-defined subgroup by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: Clinically, ER+PR-HER2- tumors showed lower endocrine responsiveness than did ER+PR+HER2- tumors. Genomically, copy number loss or promoter methylation of PR genes occurred in 75% of ER+PR-HER2- tumors, collectively explaining PR loss. ER+PR-HER2- tumors had higher TPS3 (30.3% vs. 17.0%) and lower PIK3CA mutation rates (25.8% vs. 42.7%) and exhibited more ZNF703 (21.5% vs. 13.6%) and RPS6KBJ (18.5% vs. 7.8%) amplification events than ER+PR+HER2- tumors. Among ER+PR-HER2- tumors, nearly 20% were of the PAM50-defined non-luminal-like subgroup and manifested lower endocrine sensitivity scores and enriched biosynthesis, metabolism and DNA replication pathways. We further identified the non-luminal-like subgroup using three IHC markers, GATA3, CK5, and EGFR. These IHC-defined non-luminal-like (GATA3-negative, CK5-positive and/or EGFR-positive) tumors received limited benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. Conclusion: ER+PR-HER2- breast cancer consists of clinically and genomically distinct groups that may require different treatment strategies. The non-luminal-like subgroup was associated with reduced benefit from endocrine therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:6386 / 6399
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Molecular essence and endocrine responsiveness of estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer
    Ke-Da Yu
    Yi-Zhou Jiang
    Shuang Hao
    Zhi-Ming Shao
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 13
  • [2] Molecular essence and endocrine responsiveness of estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer
    Yu, Ke-Da
    Jiang, Yi-Zhou
    Hao, Shuang
    Shao, Zhi-Ming
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2015, 13
  • [3] Clinical considerations for estrogen receptor-negative/ progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (ER-PR+HER2-) breast cancer
    Rala de Paula, Bruno Henrique
    Crocamo, Susanne
    Bines, Jose
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 4
  • [4] EFFECT OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY ON ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-NEGATIVE, PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR-POSITIVE AND HER2 NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
    Shen, Jun
    Wang, Lin-bo
    Teng, Rong-yue
    Shen, Jian-guo
    [J]. ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2022, 38 (03): : 1595 - 1600
  • [5] Characterization of estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer
    Shen, Tiansheng
    Brandwein-Gensler, Margaret
    Hameed, Omar
    Siegal, Gene P.
    Wei, Shi
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 46 (11) : 1776 - 1784
  • [6] Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive and her-2-negative breast cancer might no longer be classified as hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
    Zheng, Hongjuan
    Ge, Chenyang
    Lin, Haiping
    Wu, Lunpo
    Wang, Qinghua
    Zhou, Shishi
    Tang, Wanfen
    Zhang, Xia
    Jin, Xiayun
    Xu, Xifeng
    Hong, Zhongwu
    Fu, Jianfei
    Du, Jinlin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 27 (07) : 1145 - 1153
  • [7] Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive and her-2-negative breast cancer might no longer be classified as hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
    Hongjuan Zheng
    Chenyang Ge
    Haiping Lin
    Lunpo Wu
    Qinghua Wang
    Shishi Zhou
    Wanfen Tang
    Xia Zhang
    Xiayun Jin
    Xifeng Xu
    Zhongwu Hong
    Jianfei Fu
    Jinlin Du
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2022, 27 : 1145 - 1153
  • [8] Natural history of estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer
    Nikoic-Vukosavljevic, D
    Kanjer, K
    Neskovic-Konstantinovic, Z
    Vukotic, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 2002, 17 (03): : 196 - 200
  • [9] Immunohistochemical and clinicopathologic features of estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive, HER-2 negative breast carcinomas
    De Nardi, Rosana Pellin
    Uchoa, Diego
    Remonatto, Gabriela
    Biazus, Jorge Villanova
    Damin, Andrea Pires
    [J]. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 67 (02): : 265 - 270
  • [10] Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
    Burstein, Harold J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 383 (26): : 2557 - 2570