Relationship of family formation characteristics with unsafe abortion: is it confounded by women's socio-economic status? - A case-control study from Sri Lanka

被引:8
|
作者
Arambepola, Carukshi [1 ]
Rajapaksa, Lalini C. [2 ]
Attygalle, Deepika [3 ]
Moonasinghe, Loshan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colombo, Fac Med, Dept Community Med, Kynsey Rd, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
[2] Univ Colombo, Kynsey Rd, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
[3] Minist Hlth, Family Hlth Bur, de Saram Pl, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
来源
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH | 2016年 / 13卷
关键词
Family formation characteristics; Unsafe abortion; Socio-economic status; POSTABORTION CARE; DETERMINANTS; MISOPROSTOL; PREVALENCE; WORLDWIDE;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-016-0173-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Literature shows that choice for unsafe abortion is often driven by poverty. However, factors related to the family formation behaviour of women are also implied as determinants of this decision. This study assessed which family formation characteristics of women are associated with the risk of unsafe abortion, without being confounded by their low socio-economic status among Sri Lankan women admitted to hospital following post-abortion complications. Methods: An unmatched case-control study was conducted in nine hospitals in eight districts in Sri Lanka among 171 women with post-abortion complications following unsafe abortion (Cases) and 600 postpartum mothers admitted to same hospitals during the same period for delivery of term unintended pregnancies (Controls). Interviewer-administered-questionnaires obtained demographic, socio-economic and family formation related characteristics. Risk factors of abortion were assessed by odds-ratio (OR), adjusted for their socio-economic status in logistic regression analysis. Results: Low socio-economic status, characterised by low-education (adjusted OR = 1.5; 95 % CI = 1.1-2.4) and less/unskilled occupations (2.3; 1.4-3.6) was a significant risk factor for unsafe abortion. Independent of this risk, being unmarried (9.3; 4.0-21.6), failure in informed decisions about desired family size (2.2; 1.4-3.5), not having a girl-child (2.2; 1.4-3.4) and longer average birth intervals (0.7 years; 0.6-0.8) signified the vulnerability of women for unsafe abortion. Cases were as fast as the controls in their family completion (4.3 versus 4.5 years; p = 0.4), but were at increased risk for abortion, if their average birth intervals (including the last one) were longer. Previous contraceptive use, age at reproductive events or partners' characteristics did not impart any risk for abortion. Conclusions: Low socio-economic status is not the most influencing risk factor for unsafe abortions leading to complications, but many other factors in relation to their family formation characteristics that are independent of their low socio-economic status.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Relationship of family formation characteristics with unsafe abortion: is it confounded by women’s socio-economic status? - A case–control study from Sri Lanka
    Carukshi Arambepola
    Lalini C. Rajapaksa
    Deepika Attygalle
    Loshan Moonasinghe
    [J]. Reproductive Health, 13
  • [2] Socio-Economic Status and Deprivation in Crohn's Disease: A Case-Control Study
    Nahon, Stephane
    Lahmek, Pierre
    Delas, Benedicte
    Maurer, Cyril
    Poupardin, Cecile
    Lesgourgues, Bruno
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A364 - A364
  • [3] Usual hospital care versus post-abortion care for women with unsafe abortion: a case control study from Sri Lanka
    Carukshi Arambepola
    Lalini C Rajapaksa
    Chandani Galwaduge
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 14
  • [4] Usual hospital care versus post-abortion care for women with unsafe abortion: a case control study from Sri Lanka
    Arambepola, Carukshi
    Rajapaksa, Lalini C.
    Galwaduge, Chandani
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [5] The impact of socio-economic status on infant deaths: a case-control study from Istanbul
    Girgin, S.
    Ayvaz, I.
    Keser, N. Bakir
    Gemici, E.
    Sezerol, M. A.
    Batman, M.
    Karabacak, O.
    Davun, S.
    Hidiroglu, S.
    Ay, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [6] Direct impacts of landslides on socio-economic systems: a case study from Aranayake, Sri Lanka
    Perera E.N.C.
    Jayawardana D.T.
    Jayasinghe P.
    Bandara R.M.S.
    Alahakoon N.
    [J]. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 5 (1)
  • [7] An Assessment of Socio-Economic Status of Women on Family Farms: Slovenian Case Study
    Prisenk, Jernej
    Vesenjak, Urska
    Rozman, Crtomir
    Turk, Jernej
    Pazek, Karmen
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 13 (04):
  • [8] Socio-economic status and autism spectrum disorder: A case-control study in Bangladesh
    Khan, Md. Shahid
    Kabir, Mohammad Alamgir
    Tareq, Shafi Mohammad
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 38
  • [9] SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS FOR DEPRESSION IN WOMEN OF NORTHERN PAKISTAN: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
    Bano, Shakila
    Mohammad, Niaz
    Yousafzai, Abdul Wahab
    [J]. KHYBER MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL-KMUJ, 2020, 12 (03): : 183 - 187
  • [10] Effect of socio-economic status and estimation of lipid peroxidation and antioxidant in preeclamptic pregnant women: a case-control study
    Sarwar, Md. Shahid
    Sarkar, Rakhesh Chandra
    Bhowmick, Rumpa
    Dewan, Syed Masudur Rahman
    Ahmed, Maizbha Uddin
    Hasnat, Abul
    Rashid, Mamunur
    Islam, Mohammad Safiqul
    [J]. HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2015, 34 (01) : 125 - 135