Validation of rapid antibody (IgG-IgM) test kit for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Qatar

被引:1
|
作者
Mundodan, Jesha [1 ]
Hasnain, Samina [1 ]
Khogali, Hayat [1 ]
Al Bayat, Soha Shawqi [1 ]
Ali, Dina [1 ]
Alateeg, Saif [1 ]
Al-Romaihi, Hamad [1 ]
Al-Thani, Mohammed Hamad J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Dept, Natl COVID Trackn Trace Team, Hlth Protect & Communicable Dis Control HP CDC, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Rapid test kits; validity; IgG/IgM; antibody detection; predictive value;
D O I
10.4081/jphr.2021.2421
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: In response to the growing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the shortage of laboratory based molecular testing capacity and reagents, multiple diagnostic test manufacturers have developed rapid and easy to use devices to facilitate testing outside laboratory settings. These kits are either based on detection of proteins from SARS-CoV-2 virus or detection of antigen or human antibodies generated in response to the infection. However, it is important to understand their performance characteristics and they must be validated in the local population setting. Design and methods: The objective is to assess the validity of the rapid test for IgG and IgM immunoglobulins compared to the current gold standard reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. A total of 16951 asymptomatic individuals were tested by the Ministry of Public Health track-and-trace team using both rapid immunodiagnostic test and RT-PCR as part of screening across various random settings with potential risk of community interaction prior to gradual lifting of restrictions in Qatar. Rapid test was considered to be posiive if both IgG and IgM are positive, while only IgG/IgM positive was considered as rapid test negative. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results: The sensitivity of rapid test kit was found to be 0.9%, whereas the specificity was found to be 97.8%. the PPV was found to be 0.3% whereas the NPV was found to be 99.4%. Conclusions: Based on the outcome and results of the study, it appears that the sensitivity and PPV of the rapid antibody test are low. As such, this test is not recommended for use to assist in taking clinic-based decisions or decisions related to quarantine/isolation.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and usefulness of a rapid IgM-IgG antibody test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A preliminary report
    Spicuzza, Lucia
    Montineri, Arturo
    Manuele, Rosa
    Crimi, Claudia
    Pistorio, Maria P.
    Campisi, Raffaele
    Vancheri, Carlo
    Crimi, Nunzio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2020, 81 (02) : E53 - E54
  • [2] Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis
    Li, Zhengtu
    Yi, Yongxiang
    Luo, Xiaomei
    Xiong, Nian
    Liu, Yang
    Li, Shaoqiang
    Sun, Ruilin
    Wang, Yanqun
    Hu, Bicheng
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Yongchen
    Wang, Jing
    Huang, Baofu
    Lin, Ye
    Yang, Jiasheng
    Cai, Wensheng
    Wang, Xuefeng
    Cheng, Jing
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Sun, Kangjun
    Pan, Weimin
    Zhan, Zhifei
    Chen, Liyan
    Ye, Feng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 92 (09) : 1518 - 1524
  • [3] Evaluation of a Lateral Flow Immunoassay COVIDTECH® SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG Antibody Rapid Test
    Exinger, Julien
    Hartard, Cedric
    Lafferriere, Fanny
    Fenninger, Christelle
    Charbonniere, Loic J.
    Jeulin, Helene
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 75 (04) : 334 - 340
  • [4] Evaluation of A Rapid IgM-IgG Combined Antibody Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Single Italian Center Study
    Margiotti, Katia
    Cupellaro, Marina
    Emili, Sabrina
    Mesoraca, Alvaro
    Giorlandino, Claudio
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 16 (02) : 85 - 88
  • [5] Validation and performance comparison of two SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM rapid tests
    Awaji, Nisreen Naser Al
    Ahmedah, Hanadi Talal
    Alsaady, Isra Mohammed
    Bawaked, Rowaedh Ahmed
    Alraey, Mohammed A.
    Alasiri, Ahmed Ayed
    Alfaifi, Abdullah Mofareh
    Alshehri, Hamdan Ali
    Alserihi, Raed
    Yasin, Elrashed B.
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (06) : 3433 - 3437
  • [6] Validation of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antibody test in general practice
    Domen, Julie
    Verbakel, Jan Yvan Jos
    Adriaenssens, Niels
    Scholtes, Beatrice
    Peeters, Bart
    Bruyndonckx, Robin
    De Sutter, An
    Heytens, Stefan
    van den Bruel, Ann
    Desombere, Isabelle
    Van Damme, Pierre
    Goossens, Herman
    Buret, Laetitia
    Duysburgh, Els
    Coenen, Samuel
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [7] SARS-CoV-2 immunochromatographic IgM/IgG rapid test in pregnancy: A false friend?
    Fabre, M.
    Ruiz-Martinez, S.
    Monserrat Cantera, M. E.
    Cortizo Garrido, A.
    Beunza Fabra, Z.
    Peran, M.
    Benito, R.
    Mateo, P.
    Paules, C.
    Oros, D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 58 (02) : 149 - 152
  • [8] Analytical performances of five SARS-CoV-2 whole-blood finger-stick IgG-IgM combined antibody rapid tests
    Pere, Helene
    Bouassa, Ralph-Sydney Mboumba
    Tonen-Wolyec, Serge
    Podglajen, Isabelle
    Veyer, David
    Belec, Laurent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 290
  • [9] Performing rapid metabolite tests (IgG-IgM) for SARS-CoV-2 infection in community pharmacies: A cross sectional-study from Brazil
    de Melo, Renato Bruno Cavalcante
    de Sena, Maria Pantoja Moreira
    Oliveira, Camila Martins
    Sales, Clarisse Andrade
    de Souza, Marcos Felipe Rodrigues
    Mello, Amanda Gabryelle Nunes Cardoso
    Ribeiro, Carolina Heitmann Mares Azevedo
    Vieira, Jose Luiz Fernandes
    de Sena, Luann Wendel Pereira
    [J]. PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2023, 21 (03):
  • [10] Clinical validation of an immunochromatographic SARS-Cov-2 IgM/IgG antibody assay with Japanese cohort
    Kaneko, Shun
    Nukui, Yoko
    Arashiro, Takeshi
    Aiso, Yoshibumi
    Sugii, Maya
    Hadano, Yoshiro
    Nagata, Kaoru
    Taki, Reiko
    Ueda, Ken
    Hanada, Satoko
    Suzaki, Shinichiro
    Harada, Naoshige
    Yamaguchi, Yoshimi
    Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
    Kurosaki, Masayuki
    Nagasawa, Masayuki
    Izumi, Namiki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (01) : 569 - 572