Safety Instrumented System-Requirements for Successful Operation and Maintenance

被引:0
|
作者
Selega, Rafal P. [1 ]
机构
[1] ABB, Safety Lead Competency Ctr, Howard Rd, St Neots PE19 8EU, Cambs, England
关键词
D O I
10.3303/CET1648104
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In today's world, personal risk posed by hazardous explosive or flammable industry processes depends on the correct functioning of both Safety Instrumented and other technology protection systems. They must be properly designed, operated, maintained and managed in order to achieve a tolerable level of risk on site. IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 standards constitute good engineering practice for safety instrumented systems (SIS) in this area. Based on these standards, this paper will attempt to explore the requirements constituting good practice for operation and maintenance of SIS for the process industry. Good practice for operations and maintenance comprises essentially a number of legs for successful SIS operation: 1. Operation - The SIS is correctly operated within its specified limits for a specified operating time interval. 2. Maintenance - The routine recurring work implemented to keep a SIS in its designed capacity and at optimum efficiency. 3. Management - The coordination of the efforts of people to achieve safety. This comprises planning, organizing, competent staffing, leading and controlling. For each of these three legs a number of key activities have been explored. The following list summarizes those topics which are to be addressed within the following sections of this paper: Essential SIS documentation Action to be taken on detection of SIS fault and SIF bypass SIF device life time SIS security Corrective, preventive and reliability centered maintenance SIF proof test, inspections, Test results analysis and spare parts Organization, planning and staff competency Assessment, auditing and management of change
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 624
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The ideal couch tracking system-Requirements and evaluation of current systems
    Joehl, Alexander
    Ehrbar, Stefanie
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Kloeck, Stephan
    Mack, Andreas
    Meboldt, Mirko
    Zeilinger, Melanie
    Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
    Daners, Marianne Schmid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (10): : 152 - 159
  • [2] Safety instrumented system
    Kingman, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL GAS ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 45 (03): : 27 - 27
  • [3] COSMOS (computerized safety, maintenance and operation system of the Shinkansen)
    Sano, H
    Shirayama, J
    Fuchi, Y
    Okazaki, S
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN RAILWAYS VI, 1998, 2 : 1085 - 1094
  • [4] Successful safety-instrumented systems design
    Goble, WM
    [J]. INTECH, 2001, 48 (06) : 98 - 99
  • [5] Optimization of Maintenance Schedule for Safety Instrumented Systems
    Martynova, Dina
    Zhang, Ping
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 12484 - 12489
  • [6] A risk assessment methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of safeguards and determining safety instrumented system requirements
    Huff, AM
    Montgomery, RL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP ON RISK ANALYSIS IN PROCESS SAFETY, 1997, : 111 - 126
  • [7] Implementation of a safety instrumented system
    Shishiba, Ryotaro
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-8, 2007, : 2484 - 2487
  • [8] Optimization of safety instrumented system performance and maintenance costs in Algerian oil and gas facilities
    Rabah, Bilal
    Younes, Ramdane
    Djeddi, Choayb
    Laouar, Lakhdar
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2024, 182 : 371 - 386
  • [9] Enhanced safety instrumented system
    不详
    [J]. CONTROL & AUTOMATION, 2007, 18 (06): : 2 - 2
  • [10] System design and maintenance modelling for safety in extended life operation
    Andrews, John
    Fecarotti, Claudia
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 163 : 95 - 108